Suppr超能文献

益生菌在危重病中的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Probiotics in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2022 Aug 1;50(8):1175-1186. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005580. Epub 2022 May 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics on morbidity and mortality in critically ill adults and children.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and unpublished sources from inception to May 4, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

We performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared enteral probiotics or synbiotics to placebo or no treatment in critically ill patients. We screened studies independently and in duplicate.

DATA EXTRACTION

Independent reviewers extracted data in duplicate. A random-effects model was used to pool data. We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixty-five RCTs enrolled 8,483 patients. Probiotics may reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (relative risk [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89 and risk difference [RD], 6.9% reduction; 95% CI, 2.7-10.2% fewer; low certainty), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP) (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; RD, 5.5% reduction; 95% CI, 8.2-2.0% fewer; low certainty), ICU length of stay (LOS) (mean difference [MD], 1.38 days fewer; 95% CI, 0.57-2.19 d fewer; low certainty), hospital LOS (MD, 2.21 d fewer; 95% CI, 1.18-3.24 d fewer; low certainty), and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MD, 2.53 d fewer; 95% CI, 1.31-3.74 d fewer; low certainty). Probiotics probably have no effect on mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.04 and RD, 1.1% reduction; 95% CI, 2.8% reduction to 0.8% increase; moderate certainty). Post hoc sensitivity analyses without high risk of bias studies negated the effect of probiotics on VAP, HAP, and hospital LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Low certainty RCT evidence suggests that probiotics or synbiotics during critical illness may reduce VAP, HAP, ICU and hospital LOS but probably have no effect on mortality.

摘要

目的

确定益生菌或合生剂在危重症成人和儿童中的发病率和死亡率的安全性和疗效。

数据来源

我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和截至 2021 年 5 月 4 日的未发表资料。

研究选择

我们对比较肠内益生菌或合生剂与安慰剂或无治疗的危重症患者的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统检索。我们独立地进行了两次筛查研究。

数据提取

独立审查员重复提取数据。使用随机效应模型汇总数据。我们使用推荐评估、制定与评价分级方法评估每个结局的证据总体确定性。

数据综合

65 项 RCT 纳入 8483 例患者。益生菌可能减少呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)(相对风险 [RR],0.72;95%CI,0.59 至 0.89 和风险差异 [RD],6.9%减少;95%CI,2.7-10.2%减少;低确定性)、医疗机构获得性肺炎(HAP)(RR,0.70;95%CI,0.55-0.89;RD,5.5%减少;95%CI,8.2-2.0%减少;低确定性)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(MD,少 1.38 天;95%CI,0.57-2.19 d 少;低确定性)、医院住院时间(MD,少 2.21 d;95%CI,1.18-3.24 d 少;低确定性)和有创机械通气时间(MD,少 2.53 d;95%CI,1.31-3.74 d 少;低确定性)。益生菌可能对死亡率没有影响(RR,0.95;95%CI,0.87-1.04 和 RD,1.1%减少;95%CI,2.8%减少至 0.8%增加;中等确定性)。无高偏倚风险研究的事后敏感性分析否定了益生菌对 VAP、HAP 和医院 LOS 的影响。

结论

低确定性 RCT 证据表明,危重症期间使用益生菌或合生剂可能减少 VAP、HAP、ICU 和医院 LOS,但可能对死亡率没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验