Department of Physics, 8637University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Appl Spectrosc. 2022 Aug;76(8):894-904. doi: 10.1177/00037028221092789. Epub 2022 May 24.
Five species of bacteria including , , , , and were deposited from suspensions of various titers onto disposable nitrocellulose filter media for analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Bacteria were concentrated and isolated in the center of the filter media during centrifugation using a simple and convenient sample preparation step. Summing all the single-shot LIBS spectra acquired from a given bacterial deposition provided perfectly sensitive and specific discrimination from sterile water control specimens in a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Use of the single-shot spectra provided only a 0.87 and 0.72 sensitivity and specificity, respectively. To increase the statistical validity of chemometric analyses, a library of pseudodata was created by adding Gaussian noise to the measured intensity of every emission line in an averaged spectrum of each bacterium. The normally distributed pseudodata, consisting of 4995 spectra, were used to compare the performance of the PLS-DA with a discriminant function analysis (DFA) and an artificial neural network (ANN). For the highly similar bacterial data, no algorithm showed significantly superior performance, although the PLS-DA performed least accurately with a classification error of 0.21 compared to 0.16 and 0.17 for ANN and DFA, respectively. Single-shot LIBS spectra from all of the bacterial species were classified in a DFA model tested with a tenfold cross-validation. Classification errors ranging from 20% to 31% were measured due to repeatability limitations in the single-shot data.
五种细菌,包括 、 、 、 和 ,被沉淀于悬浮液中,置于一次性硝化纤维素滤膜上,用于激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)分析。在离心过程中,细菌在滤膜中心被浓缩和分离,采用简单方便的样品制备步骤。对来自特定细菌沉积的所有单次 LIBS 光谱进行求和,在偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)中,可从无菌水对照标本中进行完美敏感和特异性区分。单次光谱的使用仅分别提供了 0.87 和 0.72 的灵敏度和特异性。为了提高化学计量学分析的统计有效性,通过向每个细菌平均光谱中的每个发射线的测量强度添加高斯噪声,创建了一个伪数据库。正态分布的伪数据,包含 4995 个光谱,用于比较 PLS-DA 与判别函数分析(DFA)和人工神经网络(ANN)的性能。对于高度相似的细菌数据,没有一种算法表现出明显的优势,尽管 PLS-DA 的分类错误为 0.21,而 ANN 和 DFA 的分类错误分别为 0.16 和 0.17,表现最不准确。在经过十倍交叉验证的 DFA 模型中,对所有细菌物种的单次 LIBS 光谱进行了分类。由于单次数据的重复性限制,测量的分类错误率在 20%到 31%之间。