Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Research Unit of Key Technique for Diagnosis and Treatments of Hematologic Malignancies, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):586.e1-586.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.027. Epub 2022 May 21.
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor (MSD-HSCT) and intensive immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are 2 major comparable treatments for SAA. As the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG) to standard IST therapy has greatly improved the survival prognosis of SAA, whether MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG is the better choice has become a matter of debate. A study was performed involving 99 patients with newly diagnosed acquired SAA from 5 medical centers, including 48 MSD-HSCT cases and 51 IST/EPAG cases, which consisted of rabbit antithymocyte globulin or porcine-antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine plus eltrombopag. The results suggested that patients treated with MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG had similar overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 95% (P = .97). However, the event-free survival rate (EFS) of IST/EPAG (71.0%) was significantly lower than that of MSD-HSCT (89.6%), P = .04. Subgroup analysis indicated that the OS of the MSD-HSCT group was superior to that of the IST/EPAG group (100% versus 85.7%, P = .04) among those with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). Both the complete response rate (CR) and overall response rate (OR) with MSD-HSCT were significantly higher than those with IST/EPAG (CR: 79.2% versus 15.7%, P < .001; OR: 97.9% versus 72.6%, P = .001). In conclusion, IST/EPAG or MSD-HSCT treatment achieves an equally high OS in SAA, but MSD-HSCT leads to a better OS in patients with VSAA and shows advantages in improving EFS and accelerating hematopoietic reconstruction in patients with SAA.
重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)是一种危及生命的骨髓衰竭性疾病。异基因造血干细胞移植(MSD-HSCT)和强化免疫抑制治疗(IST)是 SAA 的两种主要可比治疗方法。由于在标准 IST 治疗中添加艾曲波帕(EPAG)极大地改善了 SAA 的生存预后,因此 MSD-HSCT 或 IST/EPAG 哪个是更好的选择已成为一个争论的问题。一项涉及来自 5 个医疗中心的 99 例新诊断的获得性 SAA 患者的研究,包括 48 例 MSD-HSCT 病例和 51 例 IST/EPAG 病例,这些病例由兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或猪抗淋巴细胞球蛋白、环孢素加艾曲波帕组成。结果表明,接受 MSD-HSCT 或 IST/EPAG 治疗的患者的总生存率(OS)相似,超过 95%(P=0.97)。然而,IST/EPAG 的无事件生存率(EFS)(71.0%)明显低于 MSD-HSCT(89.6%),P=0.04。亚组分析表明,在极重型再生障碍性贫血(VSAA)患者中,MSD-HSCT 组的 OS 优于 IST/EPAG 组(100%与 85.7%,P=0.04)。MSD-HSCT 的完全缓解率(CR)和总体缓解率(OR)均明显高于 IST/EPAG(CR:79.2%与 15.7%,P<0.001;OR:97.9%与 72.6%,P=0.001)。总之,IST/EPAG 或 MSD-HSCT 治疗在 SAA 中均能达到同等高的 OS,但 MSD-HSCT 在 VSAA 患者中导致更好的 OS,并在改善 EFS 和加速 SAA 患者造血重建方面具有优势。