Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007918.
As part of an effort to meet ambitious male circumcision targets in Eswatini, programme implementers have increasingly focused on young males, raising questions about informed consent. Males aged 10-19 years account for more than two-thirds of those circumcised since 2008 when internationally funded circumcision campaigns began in Eswatini. The ethical guidelines of these programmes conform to international standards, requiring that informed consent or assent be obtained prior to surgery. This article examines clients' levels of circumcision-related knowledge following the assent process, as well as how ethical guidelines were enacted in everyday practice in a setting where family dynamics and norms relating to autonomy and consensus make obtaining informed consent complex, especially when clients are incentivised with football kits and other material goods to encourage circumcision.
We conducted qualitative research in a health clinic where circumcision services for HIV prevention were being offered. Methods included focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, participant observation and informal interviews with young men undergoing circumcision in the clinic.
Implementers paid little attention to risks, focusing more on benefits of circumcision. Incentives, usually in the form of sporting goods, increased participation, while also limiting autonomy. We also found that parental authority overpowers young males' preferences regarding circumcision. Young males' understanding of the risks associated with circumcision was poor. Most assumed HIV testing was obligatory.
The drive to eliminate HIV infections in Eswatini has opened the door for interventions such as targeted circumcision campaigns. In contradiction to international ethical guidelines and the policies of the Ministry of Health and voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) implementers, we conclude that, in practce, respect for young males' rights and decision-making in the VMMC consent process is limited by complex social, economic and political realities.
作为实现斯威士兰男性割礼目标的努力的一部分,方案实施者越来越关注年轻男性,这引发了关于知情同意的问题。自 2008 年国际资助的割礼运动在斯威士兰开始以来,10-19 岁的男性占接受割礼者的三分之二以上。这些方案的道德准则符合国际标准,要求在手术前获得知情同意或同意。本文研究了同意程序后客户对割礼相关知识的了解程度,以及在家庭动态以及与自主权和共识相关的规范使获得知情同意变得复杂的情况下,道德准则在日常实践中的实施情况,尤其是当客户获得足球装备和其他物质奖励来鼓励割礼时。
我们在提供艾滋病毒预防割礼服务的诊所进行了定性研究。方法包括焦点小组讨论、深入访谈、参与观察和在诊所接受割礼的年轻男性的非正式访谈。
实施者很少关注风险,更多地关注割礼的好处。激励措施,通常以体育用品的形式,增加了参与度,同时也限制了自主权。我们还发现,父母对年轻男性割礼偏好的权威超过了他们的自主权。年轻男性对割礼相关风险的理解很差。大多数人认为 HIV 检测是强制性的。
在斯威士兰消除艾滋病毒感染的努力为有针对性的割礼运动等干预措施打开了大门。与国际道德准则和卫生部政策以及自愿男性割礼(VMMC)实施者相反,我们的结论是,在实践中,VMMC 同意过程中对年轻男性权利和决策的尊重受到复杂的社会、经济和政治现实的限制。