Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Semin Oncol. 2022 Apr;49(2):136-140. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Data in patients with malignant melanoma, who have been previously treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, show a reduction in pembrolizumab efficacy upon rechallenge. We examined this scenario in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) eligible for adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy. We hypothesized that a proportion of such patients will either require re-treatment with pembrolizumab upon metastatic progression prior to cancer-specific mortality (CSM) or die from other cause mortality (OCM).
We identified within the SEER database 10,635 patients, between 2004 and 2017, with a diagnosis of non-metastatic intermediate-high and high risk RCC, who had undergone nephrectomy and fulfilled criteria for enrollment in KEYNOTE-564. Kaplan-Meier analyses addressed overall survival (OS), CSM and OCM.
9,825 (92.4%) of the 10,635 patients had intermediate-high risk RCC and 9,456 (88.9%) underwent radical nephrectomy. Additionally, 760 (7.1%) harbored sarcomatoid features. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, median OS was 9.8 (9.1-11.4) years. At 10-years of follow-up, CSM rate was 36% and OCM rate was 22%.
Based on CSM, our observations indicate that by 10-years of follow-up 36% of patients treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab will require a rechallenge, in a setting where a checkpoint inhibitor may have reduced efficacy. Moreover, at 10-years of follow-up, 22% of patients with RCC, previously treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab, will die of other causes. These percentages should be strongly considered prior to routine use of adjuvant pembrolizumab, especially given an OS benefit has not been proven.
先前接受过派姆单抗辅助治疗的恶性黑色素瘤患者的数据显示,在重新使用派姆单抗时,其疗效降低。我们检查了适合接受辅助派姆单抗治疗的肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的这种情况。我们假设,在癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)之前,一部分患者在转移进展时将需要重新使用派姆单抗治疗,或者死于其他原因的死亡率(OCM)。
我们在 SEER 数据库中确定了 10635 名患者,他们在 2004 年至 2017 年期间诊断为非转移性中高危 RCC,接受了肾切除术,并符合 KEYNOTE-564 的纳入标准。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析来评估总生存期(OS)、CSM 和 OCM。
10635 例患者中,9825 例(92.4%)患有中高危 RCC,9456 例(88.9%)接受了根治性肾切除术。此外,760 例(7.1%)存在肉瘤样特征。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,中位 OS 为 9.8(9.1-11.4)年。在 10 年的随访中,CSM 率为 36%,OCM 率为 22%。
根据 CSM,我们的观察结果表明,在接受辅助派姆单抗治疗的患者中,到 10 年的随访时,有 36%的患者需要重新挑战,在这种情况下,检查点抑制剂的疗效可能会降低。此外,在接受辅助派姆单抗治疗的 RCC 患者中,有 22%的患者在 10 年的随访中死于其他原因。在常规使用辅助派姆单抗之前,应该充分考虑这些百分比,特别是因为尚未证明 OS 获益。