Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fostemsavir in Heavily Treatment-Experienced People With HIV-1.

PURPOSE

Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 have limited treatment options. Treatment with the first-in-class attachment inhibitor fostemsavir in addition to optimized background therapy (OBT) resulted in sustained virologic and immunologic responses in HTE participants throughout 96 weeks in the BRIGHTE trial. In the absence of long-term direct comparative evidence between fostemsavir-based and other antiretroviral regimens, this analysis indirectly compares efficacy and safety across relevant available trials, adjusting for demographic and baseline characteristics.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials with designs and populations comparable to BRIGHTE. Using matching-adjusted indirect comparison analyses, individual participant data from BRIGHTE were reweighted to create balanced populations across trials, and efficacy and safety outcomes were compared.

FINDINGS

Three comparator trials were identified, 2 of which reflected an optimized therapy without fostemsavir (OBT alone): TMB-301 (ibalizumab and OBT), BENCHMRK-1/-2 (OBT alone), and VIKING-3 (OBT alone). Compared with ibalizumab and OBT (N = 40), fostemsavir and OBT (unadjusted, N = 347; adjusted, N = 236) were associated with numerically higher nonsignificant odds of virologic suppression (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 0.74-2.80; P = 0.284) and a similar increase in CD4 cell count of approximately 65 cells/mm from baseline through week 24 (mean difference = 7.05 cells/mm; 95% CI, -60.88 to 74.98 cells/mm; P = 0.834). Compared with OBT from BENCHMRK-1/-2 (N = 237), fostemsavir and OBT (adjusted, N = 126) were associated with significantly higher odds of virologic suppression (OR = 3.26; 95% CI, 2.08-5.11; P < 0.001) and increased CD4 cell count (135.78 cells/mm; 95% CI, 91.93-179.63 cells/mm; P < 0.001) at week 96. Compared with OBT from VIKING-3 (N = 183), fostemsavir and OBT (adjusted, N = 78) were associated with numerically higher odds of virologic suppression (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.78-2.30; P = 0.297) and a modest CD4 cell count increase (26.86 cells/mm; 95% CI, -10.79 to 64.52; P = 0.162) through week 48; however, differences were not significant. All-cause discontinuations and safety comparisons varied across studies.

IMPLICATIONS

Although matching-adjusted indirect comparison analyses have limitations, these results support the use of fostemsavir and OBT as an important treatment option in HTE people with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.