Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):933-941. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1624.
There is limited information on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid (ICI-BP) in patients with cancer, with most existing studies being case reports or small case series from a single institution. Prior review attempts have not approached the literature in a systematic manner and have focused only on ICI-BP secondary to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The current knowledge base of all aspects of ICI-BP is limited.
To characterize the risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, treatments, and outcomes of ICI-BP in patients with cancer as reported in the current literature.
A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Articles reporting data on individual patients who met preestablished inclusion criteria were selected, and a predefined set of data was abstracted. When possible, study results were quantitatively combined.
In total, 70 studies reporting data on 127 individual patients undergoing ICI therapy for cancer (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-77] years; 27 women [21.3%]) were included. In pooled analyses, patients ranged in age from 35 to 90 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid often occurred during the course of anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 therapy but was also found to develop up to several months after treatment cessation. Prodromal symptoms, such as pruritus or nonspecific skin eruptions, were found in approximately half of the patient population. Histopathologic or serologic testing, when undertaken, was a helpful adjunct in establishing diagnosis. Treatment with immunotherapy was discontinued after ICI-BP development in most patients. The most common treatments were systemic and topical corticosteroids. Steroid-sparing therapies, such as antibiotics and other systemic immunomodulators, were also used as adjuvant treatment modalities. Biologic and targeted agents, used predominantly in cases refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, were associated with marked symptomatic improvement in most patients.
The results of this systematic review suggest that ICI-BP often poses a therapeutic challenge for patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy. Further research on the early recognition, diagnosis, and use of targeted treatment modalities will be essential in developing more personalized treatment options for affected patients while minimizing morbidity and mortality.
关于癌症患者中免疫检查点抑制剂诱导的大疱性类天疱疮(ICI-BP)的信息有限,大多数现有研究都是来自单一机构的病例报告或小病例系列。先前的综述尝试并没有系统地研究文献,而且只关注抗程序性细胞死亡 1(PD-1)或程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)治疗引起的 ICI-BP。目前对 ICI-BP 各个方面的知识基础有限。
在当前文献中,描述癌症患者中免疫检查点抑制剂诱导的大疱性类天疱疮的危险因素、临床表现、诊断结果、治疗方法和结局。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告准则,使用 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库进行了系统评价。选择了报告符合预先设定纳入标准的个体患者数据的文章,并提取了一套预定的数据。在可能的情况下,对研究结果进行了定量合并。
共纳入 70 项研究,报道了 127 例接受癌症免疫治疗的患者的数据(中位数[IQR]年龄为 71[64-77]岁;27 例女性[21.3%])。在汇总分析中,患者年龄在 35 至 90 岁之间。免疫检查点抑制剂诱导的大疱性类天疱疮常发生在抗 PD-1、PD-L1 或细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4 治疗过程中,但也有报道在治疗停止后数月发生。约一半的患者人群存在瘙痒或非特异性皮肤疹等前驱症状。当进行组织病理学或血清学检测时,这是有助于建立诊断的辅助手段。大多数患者在发生 ICI-BP 后停止免疫治疗。最常见的治疗方法是全身和局部皮质类固醇。抗生素和其他全身免疫调节剂等类固醇助减治疗也被用作辅助治疗方式。生物制剂和靶向药物主要用于对皮质类固醇治疗有反应的病例,大多数患者的症状有明显改善。
本系统评价的结果表明,ICI-BP 通常对接受免疫治疗的癌症患者构成治疗挑战。进一步研究早期识别、诊断和使用靶向治疗方式对于为受影响的患者制定更个性化的治疗方案至关重要,同时最大限度地减少发病率和死亡率。