Suppr超能文献

反思——基础医学基于结果学习的有效策略。

Reflection - an effective strategy for outcome-based learning in basic medical sciences.

作者信息

Mussarat Uzma, Zainub Abeerah, Hanif Rabia, Ayub Sadaf, Naureen Fakhra, Inam Tahira

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Islamic International Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Department of Biochemistry, Islamic International Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Apr;72(4):639-642. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.729.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of guided reflection for improved learning outcomes in students of basic dental sciences.

METHODS

The quasi-experimental comparative educational study was conducted at the Islamic International Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan, from May to September 2019, and comprised second-year undergraduate students in the Basic Medical Sciences curriculum for Microbiology. The subjects were arbitrarily divided into Group-1, which was exposed to guided reflection, and Group-2, which was not asked to reflect on the lectures. Post-intervention, a test of 30 multiple choice questions on the selected topics was conducted to compare the level of learning between the groups. After three weeks, the same activity was repeated with the same groups, but with different topics of lectures. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.

RESULTS

Of the total 75 students, there were 28 female and 9 male students in Group-1 (Reflectors), 29 female and 9 male students in Group-2 (Non-Reflectors). Overall, there were 18 male and 57 female students. The overall 20.4±0.83 years. The difference between the groups after the first session was not significant (p>0.05). After session 2, Group-1 score was significantly better than that of Group-2 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Reflective practices on teaching sessions at the end of lectures proved to be an effective strategy to achieve outcome-based learning.

摘要

目的

确定引导式反思在提高口腔基础科学专业学生学习成果方面的作用。

方法

2019年5月至9月在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡的伊斯兰国际牙科学院开展了这项准实验性比较教育研究,研究对象为基础医学微生物学课程的本科二年级学生。将研究对象随机分为两组,第一组接受引导式反思,第二组不要求对讲座内容进行反思。干预后,就所选主题进行了一场包含30道选择题的测试,以比较两组的学习水平。三周后,对相同的两组学生重复进行相同活动,但讲座主题不同。使用SPSS 21对数据进行分析。

结果

在总共75名学生中,第一组(反思组)有28名女生和9名男生,第二组(非反思组)有29名女生和9名男生。总体而言,有18名男生和57名女生。总体年龄为20.4±0.83岁。第一次课后两组之间的差异不显著(p>0.05)。第二次课后,第一组的成绩明显优于第二组(p<0.05)。

结论

讲座结束时对教学环节进行反思性实践被证明是实现基于结果的学习的有效策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验