Tritle Brandon J, Watteyne Robert, Hickman Abby, Vento Todd J, Lopansri Bert K, Collingridge Dave S, Veillette John J
Department of Pharmacy, Intermountain Healthcare, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Intermountain Healthcare, Logan Regional Hospital, Logan, UT, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jun;57(3):377-384. doi: 10.1177/00185787211037554. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for bacteremia allow for early antimicrobial therapy modification based on organism and resistance gene identification. Studies suggest patient outcomes are optimized when infectious disease (ID)-trained antimicrobial stewardship personnel intervene on RDT results. However, data are limited regarding RDT implementation at small community hospitals, which often lack access to on-site ID clinicians. This study evaluated the impact of RDTs with and without real-time pharmacist intervention (RTPI) at a small community hospital with local pharmacist training and asynchronous support from a remote ID Telehealth pharmacist. Time to targeted therapy (TTT) in patients with bacteremia was compared retrospectively across 3 different time periods: a control without RDT, RDT-only, and RDT with RTPI. Median TTT was significantly faster in both the RDT with RTPI and RDT-only groups compared with the control group (2 vs 25 vs 51 hours respectively; < .001). TTT was numerically faster for RDT with RTPI compared with RDT-only but did not reach statistical significance ( = .078). Median time to any de-escalation was significantly shorter for RDT with RTPI compared with both RDT-only (14 vs 33 hours; = .012) and the control group (14 vs 45 hours; < .001). Median length of stay was also significantly shorter in both RDT groups compared with the control group (4.0 vs 4.1 vs 5.5 hours; = .013). This study supports RDT use for bacteremia in a small community hospital with ID Telehealth support, suggesting additional benefit with RTPI.
用于菌血症的快速诊断检测(RDT)能够基于病原体和耐药基因鉴定对早期抗菌治疗进行调整。研究表明,当经过感染性疾病(ID)培训的抗菌药物管理工作人员根据RDT结果进行干预时,患者的治疗效果会得到优化。然而,关于小型社区医院实施RDT的数据有限,这些医院往往无法获得现场ID临床医生的服务。本研究评估了在一家小型社区医院开展RDT并进行实时药师干预(RTPI)的影响,该医院对当地药师进行了培训,并获得了远程ID远程医疗药师的异步支持。回顾性比较了菌血症患者在3个不同时间段的靶向治疗时间(TTT):无RDT的对照组、仅使用RDT组和使用RDT并进行RTPI组。与对照组相比,使用RDT并进行RTPI组和仅使用RDT组的中位TTT均显著缩短(分别为2小时、25小时和51小时;P<0.001)。使用RDT并进行RTPI组的TTT在数值上比仅使用RDT组更快,但未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.078)。与仅使用RDT组(14小时对33小时;P = 0.012)和对照组(14小时对45小时;P<0.001)相比,使用RDT并进行RTPI组的任何降阶梯治疗的中位时间均显著缩短。与对照组相比,两个RDT组的中位住院时间也显著缩短(4.0天对4.1天对5.5天;P = 0.013)。本研究支持在有ID远程医疗支持的小型社区医院将RDT用于菌血症,表明RTPI可带来额外益处。