Yadav Sarika, Singh Saurabh, Mandal Payal, Tripathi Anurag
Systems Toxicology and Health Risk Assessment Group, CSIR‑Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001, India.
Food, Drugs and Chemical Toxicology Group, CSIR‑Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001, India.
Int J Mol Med. 2022 Jul;50(1). doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2022.5151. Epub 2022 May 26.
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)‑mediated allergy or hypersensitivity reactions are generally defined as an unwanted severe symptomatic immunological reaction that occurs due to shattered or untrained peripheral tolerance of the immune system. Allergen‑specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only therapeutic strategy that can provide a longer‑lasting symptomatic and clinical break from medications in IgE‑mediated allergy. Immunotherapies against allergic diseases comprise a successive increasing dose of allergen, which helps in developing the immune tolerance against the allergen. AITs exerttheirspecial effectiveness directly or indirectly by modulating the regulator and effector components of the immune system. The number of success stories of AIT is still limited and it canoccasionallyhave a severe treatment‑associated adverse effect on patients. Therefore, the formulation used for AIT should be appropriate and effective. The present review describes the chronological evolution of AIT, and provides a comparative account of the merits and demerits of different AITs by keeping in focus the critical guiding factors, such as sustained allergen tolerance, duration of AIT, probability of mild to severe allergic reactions and dose of allergen required to effectuate an effective AIT. The mechanisms by which regulatory T cells suppress allergen‑specific effector T cells and how loss of natural tolerance against innocuous proteins induces allergy are reviewed. The present review highlights the major AIT bottlenecks and the importantregulatory requirements for standardized AIT formulations. Furthermore, the present reviewcalls attention to the problem of 'polyallergy', which is still a major challenge for AIT and the emerging concept of 'component‑resolved diagnosis' (CRD) to address the issue. Finally, a prospective strategy for upgrading CRD to the next dimension is provided, and a potential technology for delivering thoroughly standardized AIT with minimal risk is discussed.
免疫球蛋白E(IgE)介导的过敏或超敏反应通常被定义为一种不必要的严重症状性免疫反应,它是由于免疫系统外周耐受性受损或未成熟而发生的。变应原特异性免疫疗法(AIT)是唯一能够在IgE介导的过敏中提供更长时间症状缓解和临床药物停用的治疗策略。针对过敏性疾病的免疫疗法包括连续递增剂量的变应原,这有助于形成对变应原的免疫耐受性。AIT通过直接或间接调节免疫系统的调节和效应成分发挥其特殊功效。AIT成功案例的数量仍然有限,并且它偶尔会对患者产生严重的治疗相关不良反应。因此,用于AIT的制剂应该合适且有效。本综述描述了AIT的时间演变,并通过关注关键指导因素,如持续的变应原耐受性、AIT持续时间、轻度至重度过敏反应的可能性以及实现有效AIT所需的变应原剂量,对不同AIT的优缺点进行了比较。综述了调节性T细胞抑制变应原特异性效应T细胞的机制以及对无害蛋白质的天然耐受性丧失如何诱发过敏。本综述强调了AIT的主要瓶颈以及标准化AIT制剂的重要监管要求。此外,本综述提请注意“多重过敏”问题,这仍然是AIT的一个主要挑战,以及用于解决该问题的“组分解析诊断”(CRD)这一新兴概念。最后,提供了将CRD提升到新维度的前瞻性策略,并讨论了一种以最小风险提供完全标准化AIT的潜在技术。