• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字荷兰产科电话分诊系统实施后规范化评估:一项包含问卷调查和焦点小组讨论的混合方法研究

Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion.

作者信息

Engeltjes Bernice, Rosman Ageeth, Scheele Fedde, Vis Christiaan, Wouters Eveline

机构信息

Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research, Faculty of Science, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Healthcare Studies, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 17;6(6):e33709. doi: 10.2196/33709.

DOI:10.2196/33709
PMID:35616176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9250067/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System (DOTTS) was developed to improve the quality of acute obstetric care. To achieve optimal effect, the DOTTS should be adopted in the daily care process by triage staff.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to evaluate the degree of implementation (ie, normalization) of the DOTTS, and the secondary aim was to evaluate which lessons can be learned from its current implementation in Dutch hospitals.

METHODS

An evaluation study with a mixed methods design was performed. All triage staff in 9 Dutch hospitals that implemented the DOTTS before September 1, 2019, were invited to complete the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire between December 2019 and July 2020. The questionnaire is based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). This self-reported questionnaire provides insights into the work people do in order to integrate and embed new practice in routine care. The NPT is based on the following 4 constructs: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Within the questionnaire, each construct is represented by 4-7 questions. Questions are scored on a 5-point normalization process scale. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of questionnaire scores. Subsequently, the questionnaire findings were discussed during a focus group. Template analysis following the 4 constructs was used for analyzing the results of the focus group.

RESULTS

Overall, 173 of 294 (58.8%) triage staff members completed the NoMAD questionnaire, and 90.2% (156/173) of the participants had used the DOTTS for over 6 months. The digital application was used as much as possible or always by 137 of 173 (79.2%) participants. The overall normalization process score was 3.77 (SD 0.36). The constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring scored 4.01 (SD 0.47), 4.05 (SD 0.45), 3.5 (SD 0.45), and 3.72 (SD 0.47), respectively. Analysis of the focus group discussion showed that the added value of the DOTTS was seen as a quality improvement for the care of pregnant women. Dedication of the complete multidisciplinary implementation team was important for facilitating normalization. Support from the medical staff and proper use by all disciplines involved in the triage were seen as facilitating factors. Participants appreciated training and evaluation, and indicated a need for ongoing training and evaluation in relation to goal achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

The DOTTS has been integrated into normal care in daily practice. Evaluation by the NoMAD questionnaire provided a positive overall score. These results are in line with or, in some aspects, better than the results of other evaluation studies. Key factors in the normalization process of the DOTTS in obstetric triage are the shared added value for stakeholders, the dedication of the complete multidisciplinary implementation team, and implementation plans that are tailor made in the practical context of the hospital.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fb/9250067/4a808c5d26d8/formative_v6i6e33709_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fb/9250067/4a808c5d26d8/formative_v6i6e33709_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fb/9250067/4a808c5d26d8/formative_v6i6e33709_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

荷兰产科电话分诊系统(DOTTS)旨在提高急性产科护理质量。为达到最佳效果,分诊人员应在日常护理过程中采用DOTTS。

目的

主要目的是评估DOTTS的实施程度(即常态化),次要目的是评估能从荷兰医院当前的实施情况中学到哪些经验教训。

方法

进行了一项采用混合方法设计的评估研究。邀请了2019年9月1日前实施DOTTS的9家荷兰医院的所有分诊人员在2019年12月至2020年7月期间完成常态化测量发展(NoMAD)问卷。该问卷基于常态化过程理论(NPT)。这份自我报告问卷能深入了解人们为将新实践融入常规护理所做的工作。NPT基于以下4个构建要素:连贯性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监测。问卷中,每个构建要素由4 - 7个问题代表。问题按5分量表进行常态化过程评分。描述性统计用于分析问卷得分。随后,在焦点小组中讨论问卷结果。采用基于4个构建要素的模板分析来分析焦点小组的结果。

结果

总体而言,294名分诊人员中有173名(58.8%)完成了NoMAD问卷,90.2%(156/173)的参与者使用DOTTS超过6个月。173名参与者中有137名(79.2%)尽可能多地或始终使用数字应用程序。总体常态化过程得分为3.77(标准差0.36)。连贯性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监测这几个构建要素的得分分别为4.01(标准差0.47)、4.05(标准差0.45)、3.5(标准差0.45)和3.72(标准差0.47)。焦点小组讨论分析表明,DOTTS的附加值被视为对孕妇护理的质量提升。完整的多学科实施团队的奉献精神对于促进常态化很重要。医务人员的支持以及分诊所涉及的所有学科的正确使用被视为促进因素。参与者重视培训和评估,并表示需要就目标达成情况进行持续培训和评估。

结论

DOTTS已融入日常实践中的常规护理。NoMAD问卷评估给出了积极的总体评分。这些结果与其他评估研究的结果一致,或在某些方面优于其他评估研究的结果。产科分诊中DOTTS常态化过程的关键因素是利益相关者的共同附加值、完整的多学科实施团队的奉献精神以及在医院实际环境中量身定制的实施计划。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion.数字荷兰产科电话分诊系统实施后规范化评估:一项包含问卷调查和焦点小组讨论的混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 17;6(6):e33709. doi: 10.2196/33709.
2
Toward an Objective Assessment of Implementation Processes for Innovations in Health Care: Psychometric Evaluation of the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) Questionnaire Among Mental Health Care Professionals.迈向医疗保健创新实施过程的客观评估:心理健康护理专业人员中标准化测量发展(NoMAD)问卷的心理测量学评估
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 20;21(2):e12376. doi: 10.2196/12376.
3
Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage.荷兰产科电话分诊的可靠性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug 7;14:3247-3254. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S319564. eCollection 2021.
4
Psychometric properties of two implementation measures: Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaire (NoMAD) and organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC).两种实施措施的心理测量特性:标准化测量发展问卷(NoMAD)和实施变革的组织准备情况(ORIC)。
Implement Res Pract. 2024 Apr 28;5:26334895241245448. doi: 10.1177/26334895241245448. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).改进复杂干预措施的规范化:第 2 部分 - 基于规范进程理论(NPT)评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具的验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x.
6
The Swedish version of the Normalization Process Theory Measure S-NoMAD: translation, adaptation, and pilot testing.《正常化进程理论测量 S-NoMAD 瑞典语版:翻译、改编和初步测试》
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 4;13(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0835-5.
7
Implementation matters: assessing the effectiveness and sustainment of an obstetric triage program at a high-volume facility in Ghana.实施很重要:评估加纳一家高流量医疗机构产科分诊项目的有效性和持续性。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 15;4(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00527-y.
8
"Diving in the deep-end and swimming": a mixed methods study using normalization process theory to evaluate a learning collaborative approach for the implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis centers.“深入潜水并畅游其中”:一项采用规范进程理论评估学习合作方法在血液透析中心实施姑息治疗实践的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):1384. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10360-7.
9
Failed implementation of a nursing intervention to support family caregivers: An evaluation study using Normalization Process Theory.一项支持家庭照顾者的护理干预措施实施失败:一项运用规范化过程理论的评估研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):937-952. doi: 10.1111/jan.16261. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
10
Assessing the implementation processes of a large-scale, multi-year quality improvement initiative: survey of health care providers.评估一项大规模、多年期质量改进计划的实施过程:对医疗服务提供者的调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3045-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing normalisation and sustainment of the Birmingham Symptom-specific Obstetric Triage System (BSOTS): a qualitative implementation evaluation study with UK maternity health professionals.影响伯明翰症状特异性产科分诊系统(BSOTS)正常化和维持的因素:一项针对英国孕产妇保健专业人员的定性实施评估研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Mar 31;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00710-3.
2
Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles.优化产科医疗中的数字临床咨询:一个现实主义的回顾和实施原则。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e079153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079153.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How to Implement Digital Services in a Way That They Integrate Into Routine Work: Qualitative Interview Study Among Health and Social Care Professionals.如何以融入日常工作的方式实施数字服务:卫生和社会保健专业人员的定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 1;23(12):e31668. doi: 10.2196/31668.
2
Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics.规划与评估远程会诊服务:一个融合复杂性与实践伦理的新概念框架
Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 13;3:726095. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095. eCollection 2021.
3
Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage.
Therapist perceptions of the implementation of a new screening procedure using the ItFits-toolkit in an iCBT routine care clinic: A mixed-methods study using the consolidated framework for implementation research.
治疗师对在网络认知行为疗法常规护理诊所中使用ItFits工具包实施新筛查程序的看法:一项使用实施研究整合框架的混合方法研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1104301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1104301. eCollection 2023.
荷兰产科电话分诊的可靠性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug 7;14:3247-3254. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S319564. eCollection 2021.
4
Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification.理论指导电子健康实施:系统评价和分类学分类。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 31;23(5):e18500. doi: 10.2196/18500.
5
Validation of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: A Prospective Validation Study.荷兰产科电话分诊系统的验证:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 10;14:1907-1915. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306390. eCollection 2021.
6
Obstetric Telephone Triage.产科电话分诊
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov 5;13:2497-2506. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S277464. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors influencing the implementation of obstetric triage: a qualitative study.影响产房产前检查实施的因素:一项定性研究。
Midwifery. 2021 Jan;92:102878. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102878. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice.在研究与实践中使用实施框架的十条建议。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Apr 30;1:42. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7. eCollection 2020.
9
Welcome to .欢迎来到。 (你提供的原文不完整,可能影响准确理解,完整准确译文需补充完整原文内容)
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:1. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00018-4. eCollection 2020.
10
Change Management in Health Care.医疗保健中的变革管理。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2020 Apr/Jun;39(2):50-65. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000290.