Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间非新冠感染患者住院期间的医生临床查房和护理要素的充分性。

Adequacy of physician clinical rounds and nursing care elements for non-COVID-19 infected patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2022 Jun;15(6):648-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic created many challenges for healthcare systems. Frontline workers and especially healthcare professionals were the most severely affected through increased working hours, burnout and major psychological distress.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the changes in standard care elements which occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically the physician clinical rounds and nursing care provided to non-COVID-19 infected patients.

DESIGN

Observational retrospective study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh Saudi Arabia. KAMC is a 1200 bed tertiary care referral academic medical center.

PATIENTS (MATERIALS) AND METHODS: We compared the physician clinical rounds and nursing care elements in all admissions due to non-COVID-19 pneumonia and ST elevation myocardial infarction during the lockdown period with similar admissions in a baseline period in the same weeks in the previous pre-lockdown.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

To evaluates the changes occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the standard care elements, such as the physician rounds and nursing care.

SAMPLE SIZE

Total of 113 patients records were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the lock down period, a total of 113 patients were admitted to the medical and cardiology wards, (95 patients with pneumonia and 18 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)) compared to 89 patients in the pre lockdown period (74 patients with pneumonia and 15 patients with STEMI). Both groups were similar in age, gender, disposition, length of stay, goal of care planning and outcome. Chronic respiratory disease and Diabetes were more present in patients admitted on the pre lockdown time. Azithromycin was more frequently used as part of the initial antibiotic regimen for pneumonia during the pre-lockdown while doxycycline was significantly more during the lockdown. For the 95 patients admitted in the medical wards during the lockdown, there were a total of 820 physicians' clinical rounds opportunities for senior and junior physicians each. The residents missed 133 (16.2%) and consultant missed 252 (30.7%) of those clinical rounds opportunities. Missed clinical rounds opportunities during the pre-lock down period was higher for residents and consultants at 19.3% (P = 0.429 ) and 36.3% respectively (P = 0.027 ). Similarly, missed clinical rounds opportunities was less during the lockdown period from 35.2% to 25% (p 0.022) and from 38.8% to 30.6% (p = 1 ) for junior staff and consultant cardiology respectively compared to pre lockdown period. For nursing care elements, there was a decrease in missed opportunities in vital signs measurement (p 0.47 and p 0.226), pain assessment (p 0.088 and p 0,366) and skin care (p 0.249 and p 0.576) for patients admitted during the lockdown period in medical and cardiology wards.

CONCLUSIONS

Caring for patients admitted for non COVID 19 infection reasons, physicians' clinical rounds did marginally increase compared to pre lockdown period while nurses monitoring for those patients was significantly higher. No difference in mortality was observed for patients admitted pre and during lockdown. The number of missed opportunities to do clinical rounds by physicians remains high during both periods and measures to improve adherence of physicians to performed clinical rounds are needed.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行给医疗系统带来了诸多挑战。一线工作人员,尤其是医护人员,工作时间延长、疲惫不堪和严重的心理困扰,使他们受到的影响最为严重。

目的

评估 COVID-19 大流行期间标准护理要素的变化,特别是对非 COVID-19 感染患者进行的医师临床查房和护理。

设计

观察性回顾性研究。

地点

沙特阿拉伯利雅得的阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城。KAMC 是一家拥有 1200 张床位的三级转诊学术医疗中心。

患者(材料)和方法:我们比较了在封锁期间因非 COVID-19 肺炎和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死而住院的所有患者与同一周内前锁定期间类似住院的患者的医师查房和护理要素。

主要观察指标

评估 COVID-19 大流行期间标准护理要素(如医师查房和护理)发生的变化。

样本量

共分析了 113 名患者的记录。

结果

在封锁期间,共有 113 名患者入住内科和心脏病病房(95 名肺炎患者和 18 名 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者),而前锁定期间为 89 名患者(74 名肺炎患者和 15 名 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者)。两组患者在年龄、性别、处置、住院时间、治疗计划目标和结局方面相似。慢性呼吸道疾病和糖尿病在锁定前入院的患者中更为常见。在锁定前,肺炎初始抗生素方案中更常使用阿奇霉素,而在锁定期间,多西环素的使用明显增加。在封锁期间,内科病房收治的 95 名患者中,每位高级和初级医师都有 820 次临床查房机会。住院医师错过了 133 次(16.2%),顾问错过了 252 次(30.7%)。在前锁定期间,住院医师和顾问错过的临床查房机会更高,分别为 19.3%(P=0.429)和 36.3%(P=0.027)。类似地,初级工作人员和顾问在封锁期间错过的临床查房机会从 35.2%降至 25%(p 0.022)和从 38.8%降至 30.6%(p=1),与前锁定期间相比。对于护理要素,封锁期间在生命体征测量(p 0.47 和 p 0.226)、疼痛评估(p 0.088 和 p 0.366)和皮肤护理(p 0.249 和 p 0.576)方面,住院患者的机会减少。

结论

在封锁期间,为非 COVID-19 感染原因而住院的患者提供护理时,医师的临床查房略有增加,而对这些患者进行监测的护士人数明显增加。未观察到住院前和住院期间患者的死亡率有差异。在两个时期,医师错过临床查房机会的次数仍然很高,需要采取措施提高医师执行临床查房的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b017/9045878/55cac12134f5/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验