• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同清洗方法去除临时黏固剂对永久黏固种植体支持金属烤瓷冠拉伸黏结力的影响:一项体外研究。

The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Aug;8(4):1002-1007. doi: 10.1002/cre2.593. Epub 2022 May 26.

DOI:10.1002/cre2.593
PMID:35618682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382040/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing metal implant-supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1-an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2-sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3-sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4-an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5-sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6-sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05.

RESULTS

The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements.

摘要

目的

在重新粘结带固位体的种植体支持修复体(CISP)的冠时,彻底清除临时粘固剂对于永久粘固至关重要。本研究评估了不同清洁方法去除残留临时粘固剂痕迹对使用树脂粘固剂重新粘结的 CISP 最终拉伸结合力(TBF)的影响。

材料和方法

制备了 70 个计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造金属种植体支持的修复体,并将其分为 7 组(N=10)。六组(60 个样本)的修复体用含丁香酚的临时粘固剂粘结,并进行 5000 次热循环。通过万能试验机进行离断后,使用以下六种清洁方法之一对内冠的内表面进行清洁:1-超声水浴(UW),2-喷砂后用水冲洗(SW),3-喷砂和超声水浴(SUW),4-异丙醇超声浴(UA),5-喷砂后用异丙醇冲洗(SA)或 6-喷砂和异丙醇超声浴(SUA)。然后用双固化自粘结树脂粘固剂将试件粘结。在第七组(对照组,N=10)中,不经过临时粘结阶段,直接用双固化自粘结树脂粘固剂粘结。用万能试验机以 1mm/min 的十字头速度测试 TBF。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和事后 Tamhane 检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为α=0.05。

结果

SUA 组的 TBF 值最大(845±203N),临时粘固剂组的 TBF 值最小(49±20N)。所有用异丙醇清洗的组的 TBF 值均明显高于用水清洗的组。

结论

喷砂和异丙醇清洁去除残留丁香油并去除残留的临时粘固剂痕迹,可获得最高的 TBF 值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e720/9382040/514d8bd9e550/CRE2-8-1002-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e720/9382040/3ea7e014cc43/CRE2-8-1002-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e720/9382040/514d8bd9e550/CRE2-8-1002-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e720/9382040/3ea7e014cc43/CRE2-8-1002-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e720/9382040/514d8bd9e550/CRE2-8-1002-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.不同清洗方法去除临时黏固剂对永久黏固种植体支持金属烤瓷冠拉伸黏结力的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Aug;8(4):1002-1007. doi: 10.1002/cre2.593. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An study.不同清洁临时水门汀方法(含丁香酚和不含丁香酚)对最终粘结后种植体支持的氧化锆基台最终粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:22. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369624. eCollection 2023.
3
Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.使用三种不同类型的粘结剂对氧化锆陶瓷冠进行固位
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.001.
4
The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.临时粘固剂清洁方法对冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e210-e215. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12646. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.不同黏结空间设置下制作的种植体支持的牙冠的水泥选择。
J Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;22(2):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00912.x.
6
Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.使用ITI实心基台搭配六种粘结剂对铸件固位力的比较评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):343-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x.
7
Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.内间隙宽度和粘结剂类型对拉伸试验中氧化锆全冠固位力的影响。
J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.钛金属烤瓷冠桥修复体固位。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):340-347. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13706. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
9
Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.钛种植体-基台表面氧等离子体处理与喷砂处理对粘结强度和表面形貌的比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):555-62. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4355.
10
Retention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative study.用于种植体支持修复体的粘结剂保留情况:一项对比研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;23(8):1073-1078. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_590_19.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An study.不同清洁临时水门汀方法(含丁香酚和不含丁香酚)对最终粘结后种植体支持的氧化锆基台最终粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:22. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369624. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions.螺钉固位与水泥固位的种植体支持固定修复体的系统评价
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Jan 14;12:9-16. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S231070. eCollection 2020.
2
Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy.种植体治疗并发症的预防理念。
Periodontol 2000. 2019 Oct;81(1):7-17. doi: 10.1111/prd.12278.
3
Techniques for retrievability and for registering screw access holes in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A scoping review of the literature.
用于可取出性和在水泥固位种植体支持的修复体中注册螺钉孔的技术:文献的范围综述。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Mar;123(3):427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
4
What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?种植义齿最佳的可用黏固剂是什么?
Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;63(3):531-545. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis.部分牙列缺损牙弓中牙种植体上的水泥和螺钉固位固定修复体的固位失败:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):201-211. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_25_18.
6
Effect of different protocols of eugenol removal on the bond strength between the fibre post and root dentin.不同丁香酚去除方案对纤维桩与根管牙本质间粘结强度的影响。
Aust Endod J. 2019 Aug;45(2):177-183. doi: 10.1111/aej.12304. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Effects of modifying implant screw access channels on the amount of extruded excess cement and retention of cement-retained implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review.种植体螺丝通道修改对挤出多余粘结剂量和粘结固位式种植义齿修复体存留率的影响:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments.短基台上种植体支持的CAD/CAM金属基底冠的基台直径、粘接剂类型和重新粘接对固位力的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Feb;10(1):1-7. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Factors Affecting the Decision to Use Cemented or Screw-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Critical Review.影响使用骨水泥固定或螺丝固位的种植体支持固定义齿决策的因素:一项批判性综述
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 January/February;31(1):43–54. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5279. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.临时粘固剂清洁方法对冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e210-e215. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12646. Epub 2017 Jun 9.