Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e210-e215. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12646. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
To evaluate the effect of temporary cement cleaning methods on the retention of cemented crowns using zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Forty titanium specimens were fabricated to simulate prepared molars with minimally retentive taper. The Ni-Cr cast crowns were fabricated, temporarily cemented, and separated. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the temporary cement cleaning method (n = 10) as follows: control group (no temporary cementation), orange solvent group, ultrasonic cleaning group, and air-abrasion group. After the cleaning procedures, the specimens were cemented with definitive cements (zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer, RMGI, cement) and subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5-55°C, dwell time, 10 seconds). The tensile bond strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine, and the results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05).
When cemented with zinc phosphate cement, the statistical analysis showed that the value of the air-abrasion group was significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference among the other groups. When cemented with RMGI cement, the air-abrasion group showed the lowest value, and the control group showed the highest value (p < 0.01). The difference between the ultrasonic cleaning group and the orange solvent group was not statistically significant.
The use of temporary cement did not have a significant influence on retention of permanently cemented crowns when zinc phosphate cement was used for permanent cementation. Airborne-particle abrasion after provisional cementation improved retention of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement; however, the use of temporary cement significantly decreased retention of permanently cemented crowns when RMGI cement was used regardless of the temporary cement cleaning method.
评估使用磷酸锌水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀时,临时粘固剂清洁方法对粘固冠保留效果的影响。
制备 40 个钛试件以模拟具有最小保留锥度的预备磨牙。制作镍铬铸造冠,临时粘固,分离。根据临时粘固剂清洁方法(n = 10)将试件分为 4 组:对照组(无临时粘固)、橙色溶剂组、超声清洗组和喷丸处理组。清洁程序后,用常规水门汀(磷酸锌水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀,RMGI 水门汀)将试件粘固,并进行热循环(5000 次循环,5-55°C,停留时间 10 秒)。使用万能试验机测量每个试件的拉伸粘结强度,采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α = 0.05)对结果进行分析。
用磷酸锌水门汀粘固时,统计分析表明喷丸处理组的值明显高于其他组(p < 0.01)。其他组之间无统计学差异。用 RMGI 水门汀粘固时,喷丸处理组的值最低,对照组的值最高(p < 0.01)。超声清洗组和橙色溶剂组之间的差异无统计学意义。
使用磷酸锌水门汀永久粘固时,临时粘固剂的使用对永久性粘固冠的保留效果没有显著影响。临时粘固后采用喷丸处理可提高磷酸锌水门汀粘固冠的保留效果;然而,无论采用何种临时粘固剂清洁方法,使用 RMGI 水门汀时,临时粘固剂的使用会显著降低永久性粘固冠的保留效果。