Suppr超能文献

临时粘固剂清洁方法对冠固位力的影响。

The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e210-e215. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12646. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of temporary cement cleaning methods on the retention of cemented crowns using zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty titanium specimens were fabricated to simulate prepared molars with minimally retentive taper. The Ni-Cr cast crowns were fabricated, temporarily cemented, and separated. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the temporary cement cleaning method (n = 10) as follows: control group (no temporary cementation), orange solvent group, ultrasonic cleaning group, and air-abrasion group. After the cleaning procedures, the specimens were cemented with definitive cements (zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer, RMGI, cement) and subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5-55°C, dwell time, 10 seconds). The tensile bond strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine, and the results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

When cemented with zinc phosphate cement, the statistical analysis showed that the value of the air-abrasion group was significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference among the other groups. When cemented with RMGI cement, the air-abrasion group showed the lowest value, and the control group showed the highest value (p < 0.01). The difference between the ultrasonic cleaning group and the orange solvent group was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The use of temporary cement did not have a significant influence on retention of permanently cemented crowns when zinc phosphate cement was used for permanent cementation. Airborne-particle abrasion after provisional cementation improved retention of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement; however, the use of temporary cement significantly decreased retention of permanently cemented crowns when RMGI cement was used regardless of the temporary cement cleaning method.

摘要

目的

评估使用磷酸锌水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀时,临时粘固剂清洁方法对粘固冠保留效果的影响。

材料和方法

制备 40 个钛试件以模拟具有最小保留锥度的预备磨牙。制作镍铬铸造冠,临时粘固,分离。根据临时粘固剂清洁方法(n = 10)将试件分为 4 组:对照组(无临时粘固)、橙色溶剂组、超声清洗组和喷丸处理组。清洁程序后,用常规水门汀(磷酸锌水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀,RMGI 水门汀)将试件粘固,并进行热循环(5000 次循环,5-55°C,停留时间 10 秒)。使用万能试验机测量每个试件的拉伸粘结强度,采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α = 0.05)对结果进行分析。

结果

用磷酸锌水门汀粘固时,统计分析表明喷丸处理组的值明显高于其他组(p < 0.01)。其他组之间无统计学差异。用 RMGI 水门汀粘固时,喷丸处理组的值最低,对照组的值最高(p < 0.01)。超声清洗组和橙色溶剂组之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

使用磷酸锌水门汀永久粘固时,临时粘固剂的使用对永久性粘固冠的保留效果没有显著影响。临时粘固后采用喷丸处理可提高磷酸锌水门汀粘固冠的保留效果;然而,无论采用何种临时粘固剂清洁方法,使用 RMGI 水门汀时,临时粘固剂的使用会显著降低永久性粘固冠的保留效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验