Clinical efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil versus levamisole therapy in frequently relapsing and steroid dependent childhood nephrotic syndrome - A retrospective comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND

Children with frequently relapsing (FR) or steroid dependent (SD) nephrotic syndrome (NS) often develop side effects of corticosteroids. Various steroid-sparing agents are in practice, but only a few studies exist so far which have compared the safety and efficacy of these two commonly used agents.

METHODS

We did a retrospective medical records review of children with FRNS or SDNS who had levamisole or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as a steroid-sparing agent with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The aim was to compare the course of our patients on MMF and levamisole. Our primary objective was to determine the number of children in sustained remission and those with the infrequently relapsing course on levamisole and MMF and, the median time to relapse in months in the two groups. The secondary objective was to compare time to first relapse and number of relapses in FRNS and SDNS group children on MMF and levamisole.

RESULTS

A total of 88 children (34% female) with diagnosis FR/SDNS (44 each) were included in the study. Thirty-nine patients took levamisole, while 49 received MMF therapy. The median age of presentation at the relapsing course was 4.2 years. The proportion of children with sustained remission or infrequent relapsing (IFR) course on MMF was 73.6%, compared to 48.71% on levamisole (p-value .015). In addition, the median time to first relapse was 12 months (24, 1.5) and 4.5 months (24, 1) on respective medications.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcome was superior in the MMF group than levamisole, especially in SDNS patients, and also MMF was more efficacious in maintaining sustained remission.