Fouad Algendy Ahmed, Illigens Ben, Alyazeedi Ameena
Clinical Pharmacy, Geriatric Department, Rumailah Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Dresden International University, Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Dresden, Germany.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 May 19;15:1563-1575. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S339331. eCollection 2022.
The main aim is to compare the risk of severe hypoglycemia associated with the modified-release (MR) gliclazide against glimepiride in diabetic older adults.
All older adult diabetic patients who attended the emergency department (ED) between the 1st of Aug. 2017 and the end of Mar 2020 on gliclazide MR or glimepiride are included in two cohorts. We compared baseline differences between cohorts in demographics, lab results, diabetes complications, comorbidities, and drugs using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and unpaired -test for continuous variables. All the baseline variables are used in a logistic regression to produce the propensity scores for receiving gliclazide MR. The primary outcome was Severe Hypoglycemia requiring Emergency Admission (SHEA). We used documented hypoglycemia, falls, fractures, Cardiovascular ED Admission (CVEA), and recurrent ED admissions as secondary outcomes. We used a univariate logistic regression followed by a propensity score-adjusted logistic regression to identify the adjusted odds ratio. We did a subgroup analysis for low and moderate-high doses users.
We included 2320 patients, 1786 were on gliclazide MR while 534 were on glimepiride. The risk of SHEA (Adjusted Odds Ratio AOR 6.74, p=0.002), falls (AOR 1.43, p=0.003), fractures (AOR 1.43, p=0.01), CVEA (AOR 1.66, p<0.001), recurrent ED admission (AOR 1.39, p=0.002) were significantly higher. At the same time, documented hypoglycemia was insignificantly higher (AOR 1.17, p= 0.444) with gliclazide MR compared to glimepiride. The low doses of both treatments did not show any SHEA cases, while the results with higher doses showed the same pattern of increased risk with gliclazide MR as the principle analysis.
Using gliclazide MR for older patients may not be a relatively safer alternative to avoid severe hypoglycemia and its possible consequences compared to glimepiride. It may be added to glimepiride in the Beers list of medications to be avoided in older adults.
主要目的是比较糖尿病老年患者中,与缓释格列齐特相比,格列美脲所致严重低血糖的风险。
将2017年8月1日至2020年3月底期间因使用缓释格列齐特或格列美脲而到急诊科就诊的所有老年糖尿病患者纳入两个队列。我们使用卡方检验分析分类变量,使用非配对t检验分析连续变量,比较了两个队列在人口统计学、实验室检查结果、糖尿病并发症、合并症和药物方面的基线差异。所有基线变量都用于逻辑回归分析,以得出接受缓释格列齐特治疗的倾向得分。主要结局是需要紧急入院治疗的严重低血糖(SHEA)。我们将记录在案的低血糖、跌倒、骨折、心血管疾病急诊入院(CVEA)和反复急诊入院作为次要结局。我们先进行单因素逻辑回归分析,然后进行倾向得分调整的逻辑回归分析,以确定调整后的优势比。我们对低剂量和中高剂量使用者进行了亚组分析。
我们纳入了2320例患者,其中1786例使用缓释格列齐特,534例使用格列美脲。使用缓释格列齐特的患者发生SHEA(调整后优势比AOR 6.74,p = 0.002)、跌倒(AOR 1.43,p = 0.003)、骨折(AOR 1.43,p = 0.01)、CVEA(AOR 1.66,p < 0.001)、反复急诊入院(AOR 1.39,p = 0.002)的风险显著更高。同时,与格列美脲相比,缓释格列齐特记录在案的低血糖发生率虽略高,但差异无统计学意义(AOR 1.17,p = 0.444)。两种治疗的低剂量组均未出现SHEA病例,而高剂量组的结果显示,与主要分析结果一致,使用缓释格列齐特的风险增加。
与格列美脲相比,在老年患者中使用缓释格列齐特可能并非避免严重低血糖及其可能后果的相对安全选择。在老年人应避免使用的药物的Beers清单中,可能应将其添加到格列美脲中。