Schmitzberger Florian F, Hall Ashley E, Hughes Morgan E, Belle Ashwin, Benson Bryce, Ward Kevin R, Bassin Benjamin S
Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Fifth Eye, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 May 17;4(5):e0693. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000693. eCollection 2022 May.
Delayed identification of hemodynamic deterioration remains a persistent issue for in-hospital patient care. Clinicians continue to rely on vital signs associated with tachycardia and hypotension to identify hemodynamically unstable patients. A novel, noninvasive technology, the Analytic for Hemodynamic Instability (AHI), uses only the continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) signal from a typical hospital multiparameter telemetry monitor to monitor hemodynamics. The intent of this study was to determine if AHI is able to predict hemodynamic instability without the need for continuous direct measurement of blood pressure.
Retrospective cohort study.
Single quaternary care academic health system in Michigan.
Hospitalized adult patients between November 2019 and February 2020 undergoing continuous ECG and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring in an intensive care setting.
None.
One million two hundred fifty-two thousand seven hundred forty-two 5-minute windows of the analytic output were analyzed from 597 consecutive adult patients. AHI outputs were compared with vital sign indications of hemodynamic instability (heart rate > 100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, and shock index of > 1) in the same window. The observed sensitivity and specificity of AHI were 96.9% and 79.0%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 for heart rate and systolic blood pressure. For the shock index analysis, AHI's sensitivity was 72.0% and specificity was 80.3% with an AUC of 0.81.
The AHI-derived hemodynamic status appropriately detected the various gold standard indications of hemodynamic instability (hypotension, tachycardia and hypotension, and shock index > 1). AHI may provide continuous dynamic hemodynamic monitoring capabilities in patients who traditionally have intermittent static vital sign measurements.
血流动力学恶化的延迟识别仍是住院患者护理中持续存在的问题。临床医生继续依赖与心动过速和低血压相关的生命体征来识别血流动力学不稳定的患者。一种新型的非侵入性技术,即血流动力学不稳定分析器(AHI),仅使用典型医院多参数遥测监测仪的连续心电图(ECG)信号来监测血流动力学。本研究的目的是确定AHI是否能够在无需连续直接测量血压的情况下预测血流动力学不稳定。
回顾性队列研究。
密歇根州的一个单一四级医疗学术健康系统。
2019年11月至2020年2月在重症监护环境中接受连续心电图和动脉内血压监测的住院成年患者。
无。
对597例连续成年患者的1252742个5分钟分析输出窗口进行了分析。将AHI输出与同一窗口中血流动力学不稳定的生命体征指标(心率>100次/分钟、收缩压<90 mmHg和休克指数>1)进行比较。观察到AHI的敏感性和特异性分别为96.9%和79.0%,心率和收缩压的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.90。对于休克指数分析,AHI的敏感性为72.0%,特异性为80.3%,AUC为0.81。
AHI得出的血流动力学状态能够适当地检测出血流动力学不稳定的各种金标准指标(低血压、心动过速和低血压以及休克指数>1)。AHI可能为传统上进行间歇性静态生命体征测量的患者提供连续动态血流动力学监测能力。