Suppr超能文献

采用非轴向多枚小螺钉的远节指间关节融合术:轴向无头加压螺钉的生物力学分析和 15 例连续病例的临床结果。

Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with nonaxial multiple small screws: a biomechanical analysis with axial headless compression screw and clinical result of 15 consecutive cases.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 27;23(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05473-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The axial headless compression screw (AHCS) technique is a widely used method for distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) and thumb IPJ arthrodesis. However, it might not be suitable for cases over 10° flexion of fusion angle and extremely small-sized phalanx. Here, the authors describe the nonaxial multiple small screws (NMSS) technique, compare the mechanical strength of the NMSS technique with the AHCS technique, and suggest clinical outcomes of the NMSS technique.

METHODS

DIPJ and thumb IPJ arthrodesis models were simulated in the 4th generation composite bone hand. Fixation with three 1.5 mm cortical screws (NMSS) or one HCS (AHCS) was performed in each pair of the phalanx. The bending stiffness and load to failure were tested in 10 pairs of each specimen, and the torsional stiffness and torque to failure were tested in seven pairs of each specimen. Moreover, 15 consecutive clinical DIPJ and thumb IPJ arthrodesis cases were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The NMSS specimens showed significantly higher bending load to failure, torsional stiffness, and torque to failure than the AHCS specimens. All 15 arthrodesis cases were united without severe complications. The mean fusion angle was 16.3° for the nine cases of the flexed target position.

CONCLUSIONS

The NMSS technique showed biomechanical stability comparable to that of the AHCS technique in DIPJ and thumb IPJ arthrodesis. Thus, the NMSS technique could be used as a feasible option in DIPJ and thumb IPJ arthrodesis, especially when a small finger is indicated and a significant flexion angle is required.

摘要

背景

轴向无头加压螺钉(AHCS)技术是一种广泛应用于远节指间关节(DIPJ)和拇指指间关节(IPJ)融合的方法。然而,对于融合角度超过 10°弯曲和极小指骨的病例,该方法可能并不适用。在此,作者描述了非轴向多枚小螺钉(NMSS)技术,比较了 NMSS 技术与 AHCS 技术的力学强度,并提出了 NMSS 技术的临床结果。

方法

在第四代复合材料手上模拟 DIPJ 和拇指 IPJ 融合模型。在每对指骨上分别用 3 枚 1.5mm 皮质螺钉(NMSS)或 1 枚 HCS(AHCS)固定。在每组 10 个标本中测试弯曲刚度和失效载荷,在每组 7 个标本中测试扭转刚度和失效扭矩。此外,回顾性分析了 15 例连续的 DIPJ 和拇指 IPJ 融合病例。

结果

NMSS 标本的弯曲失效载荷、扭转刚度和失效扭矩均显著高于 AHCS 标本。所有 15 例融合病例均无严重并发症。在 9 例弯曲目标位置病例中,平均融合角度为 16.3°。

结论

NMSS 技术在 DIPJ 和拇指 IPJ 融合中表现出与 AHCS 技术相当的生物力学稳定性。因此,NMSS 技术可作为 DIPJ 和拇指 IPJ 融合的一种可行选择,尤其是在需要小手指且需要较大弯曲角度的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecb3/9137156/7ea37ffa2206/12891_2022_5473_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验