Suppr超能文献

胰腺癌切除标本中的肿瘤大小和T分期取决于病理检查方法。

Tumour Size and T-Stage in Pancreatic Cancer Resection Specimens Depend on the Pathology Examination Approach.

作者信息

Tran My Linh, Holm Maia Blomhoff, Verbeke Caroline Sophie

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.

Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 17;14(10):2471. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102471.

Abstract

In the eighth edition of the TNM classification for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), stages T1 to T3 are defined by tumour size, size measurement being deemed objective and accurate. This study investigated whether various, currently used approaches to tumour measurement result in different tumour sizes and differences in T-stage assignment. In a series of 315 resected PDAC, tumour sizes were measured as follows: macroscopically in a single or in two perpendicular planes and with or without microscopic corroboration. Comparison of the resulting tumour sizes showed that both macroscopic measurement in two planes and microscopic corroboration gave significantly different results (p < 0.001). Compared to the most simple approach (macroscopic measurement in one plane), the comprehensive approach (macroscopic measurement in two planes with microscopic corroboration) resulted in a larger tumour size in 263 (83%) cases (mean absolute size difference: 10 mm; mean relative size change: 36%). T-stage assignment differed in 142 (45%) cases between the simple and comprehensive approach and affected 87%, 38% and 48% of the cases deemed to be stage T1, T2 and T3, respectively. In conclusion, tumour size and T-stage are highly approach-dependent. Consensus on an accurate method is required to ensure comparability of these basic data.

摘要

在胰腺癌(PDAC)TNM分类的第八版中,T1至T3期由肿瘤大小定义,大小测量被认为是客观准确的。本研究调查了目前使用的各种肿瘤测量方法是否会导致不同的肿瘤大小以及T分期的差异。在一系列315例接受手术切除的PDAC中,肿瘤大小的测量方法如下:宏观上在一个或两个相互垂直的平面进行测量,且有或没有显微镜下的确认。对所得肿瘤大小的比较表明,在两个平面进行宏观测量以及显微镜下确认均得出了显著不同的结果(p < 0.001)。与最简单的方法(在一个平面进行宏观测量)相比,综合方法(在两个平面进行宏观测量并辅以显微镜下确认)在263例(83%)病例中导致肿瘤尺寸更大(平均绝对尺寸差异:10毫米;平均相对尺寸变化:36%)。简单方法和综合方法之间在142例(45%)病例中的T分期有所不同,分别影响了被判定为T1期、T2期和T3期病例的87%、38%和48%。总之,肿瘤大小和T分期高度依赖于测量方法。需要就一种准确的方法达成共识,以确保这些基础数据的可比性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/396c/9139767/63ca4faaf3fd/cancers-14-02471-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验