Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VUMC, ZH-7F18, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of General Surgery, Instituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Trials. 2021 Sep 9;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05506-z.
Recently, the first randomized trials comparing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for non-malignant and malignant disease showed a 2-day reduction in time to functional recovery after MIDP. However, for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), concerns have been raised regarding the oncologic safety (i.e., radical resection, lymph node retrieval, and survival) of MIDP, as compared to ODP. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial comparing MIDP and ODP in PDAC regarding oncological safety is warranted. We hypothesize that the microscopically radical resection (R0) rate is non-inferior for MIDP, as compared to ODP.
METHODS/DESIGN: DIPLOMA is an international randomized controlled, patient- and pathologist-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 38 pancreatic centers in Europe and the USA. A total of 258 patients with an indication for elective distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy because of proven or highly suspected PDAC of the pancreatic body or tail will be randomly allocated to MIDP (laparoscopic or robot-assisted) or ODP in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the microscopically radical resection margin (R0, distance tumor to pancreatic transection and posterior margin ≥ 1 mm), which is assessed using a standardized histopathology assessment protocol. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected R0 rate in the open group of 58%, expected R0 resection rate in the minimally invasive group of 67%, and a non-inferiority margin of 7%. Secondary outcomes include time to functional recovery, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, and conversion to open surgery), other histopathology findings (e.g., lymph node retrieval, perineural- and lymphovascular invasion), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications, hospital stay, and administration of adjuvant treatment), time and site of disease recurrence, survival, quality of life, and costs. Follow-up will be performed at the outpatient clinic after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months postoperatively.
The DIPLOMA trial is designed to investigate the non-inferiority of MIDP versus ODP regarding the microscopically radical resection rate of PDAC in an international setting.
ISRCTN registry ISRCTN44897265 . Prospectively registered on 16 April 2018.
最近,比较微创远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)与开放远端胰腺切除术(ODP)治疗非恶性和恶性疾病的首次随机试验显示,MIDP 术后功能恢复时间缩短了 2 天。然而,对于胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC),人们对 MIDP 的肿瘤学安全性(即根治性切除、淋巴结获取和生存)提出了担忧,与 ODP 相比。因此,需要进行一项比较 MIDP 和 ODP 在 PDAC 中肿瘤学安全性的随机对照试验。我们假设 MIDP 的显微镜下根治性切除(R0)率与 ODP 相比不劣。
方法/设计:DIPLOMA 是一项在欧洲和美国的 38 个胰腺中心进行的国际随机对照、患者和病理学家双盲、非劣效性试验。总共 258 名因胰腺体或尾部已证实或高度怀疑 PDAC 而行选择性远端胰腺切除术加脾切除术的患者将被随机分配到 MIDP(腹腔镜或机器人辅助)或 ODP 组,比例为 1:1。主要结局是显微镜下的根治性切缘(R0,肿瘤距胰腺横断和后缘的距离≥1mm),使用标准化的组织病理学评估方案进行评估。样本量根据以下假设计算:5%单侧显著性水平(α),80%功效(1-β),开放组预期 R0 率为 58%,微创组预期 R0 切除率为 67%,非劣效性边界为 7%。次要结局包括功能恢复时间、手术结果(如出血量、手术时间和转为开放手术)、其他组织病理学发现(如淋巴结获取、神经和淋巴管侵犯)、术后结果(如临床相关并发症、住院时间和辅助治疗的应用)、疾病复发的时间和部位、生存、生活质量和成本。术后 6、12、18、24 和 36 个月将在门诊进行随访。
DIPLOMA 试验旨在研究在国际环境中,MIDP 与 ODP 相比在 PDAC 的显微镜下根治性切除率方面的非劣效性。
ISRCTN 注册处 ISRCTN44897265。于 2018 年 4 月 16 日前瞻性注册。