Devaux Madeline, Boulin Mathieu, Mounier Morgane, Caillot Denis, Ahwij Nuri, Herbin Adélie, Bastie Jean Noël, Favennec Camille, Robert Philippine, Pistre Pauline, Bost Stephanie, Amiot Pauline, Jacquesson Laurence, Casasnovas Olivier, Rossi Cédric, Gueneau Pauline
Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital and EPICAD LNC UMR1231, University of Burgundy & Franche Comte, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 21;14(10):2532. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102532.
Objectives: The UMACOACH Lymphoma is a multidisciplinary monitoring program for patients initiating a first highly haematotoxic treatment for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient follow-up is based on consultation with a pharmacist and planed phone calls by nurses supervised by a clinical haematologist. Our objective was to assess effectiveness and cost of the UMACOACH Lymphoma Program (ULP) and to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This French monocentric case-control study included all patients enrolled in the ULP over a one-year period (cases) matched with retrospective patients receiving usual care (controls). Numbers of adverse events (AEs), re-hospitalisations, average relative dose intensity (ARDI), treatment response and survival were compared between the two groups. Among cases, patient satisfaction and QoL using the EORTC-QLQC30 questionnaire before and after treatment were evaluated. Results: Seventy-eight cases were matched to 78 controls. Twenty-six percent grade 3−4 AEs were observed in cases versus 38% in controls (p = 0.001). There were 76 and 88 re-hospitalisations in the case and control groups, respectively (p = 0.217). ARDI > 85% was observed in 92% and 82% of cases and controls, respectively (p = 0.138). No differences were observed in terms of treatment responses and survival. Estimated cost savings were of EUR 81,782 in favour of the case group. An improvement of 5.1 points was observed in the total QoL score before and after treatment in cases. Conclusions: A nurse−pharmacist−haematologist collaboration seems to be promising to reduce grade 3−4 AEs in HL and NHL patients receiving highly haematotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Cost savings from hospitalisation being avoided were also shown.
UMACOACH淋巴瘤项目是一项针对开始接受首次高血液毒性治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤或非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的多学科监测项目。患者随访基于与药剂师的会诊以及由临床血液科医生监督的护士安排的电话随访。我们的目的是评估UMACOACH淋巴瘤项目(ULP)的有效性和成本,并调查患者满意度和生活质量(QoL)。方法:这项法国单中心病例对照研究纳入了在一年时间内纳入ULP的所有患者(病例组),并与接受常规治疗的回顾性患者(对照组)进行匹配。比较两组之间的不良事件(AE)数量、再次住院情况、平均相对剂量强度(ARDI)、治疗反应和生存率。在病例组中评估使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC-QLQC30)在治疗前后的患者满意度和生活质量。结果:78例病例与78例对照匹配。病例组中观察到26%的3-4级AE,而对照组为38%(p = 0.001)。病例组和对照组分别有76次和88次再次住院(p = 0.217)。病例组和对照组分别有92%和82%的患者观察到ARDI>85%(p = 0.138)。在治疗反应和生存率方面未观察到差异。估计病例组节省成本81,782欧元。病例组治疗前后的总生活质量评分提高了5.1分。结论:护士-药剂师-血液科医生的合作似乎有望减少接受高血液毒性化疗方案的HL和NHL患者的3-4级AE。还显示避免了住院带来的成本节省。