School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China.
School of Public Health, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106245.
The widening gap in health service utilization between different groups in mainland China has become an important issue that cannot be avoided. Our study explored the existence of differences and the causes of the differences in the health service utilization of older rural-to-urban migrant workers in comparison to older rural dwellers. Further, our study explored socioeconomic differences in health service utilization.
The data from the China Labor-Force Dynamic Survey in 2016, the data from the Urban Statistical Yearbook in 2016, and the Statistical Bulletin were used. Our study applied the latest Andersen Model according to China's current situation. Before we studied health service utilization, we used Coarsened Exact Matching to control the confounding factors. After matching, 2314 respondents were successfully matched (859 older rural-to-urban migrant workers and 1455 older rural dwellers). The Fairlie decomposition method was used to analyze the differences and the sources of health service utilization between older rural-to-urban migrant workers and their rural counterparts.
After matching, the probability two-weeks outpatient for older rural-to-urban migrant workers (5.59%) was significantly lower than older rural dwellers (7.57%). The probability of inpatient for older rural-to-urban migrant workers (5.59%) was significantly lower than older rural dwellers (9.07%). Overall, 17.98% of the total difference for two-week outpatient utilization was due to the observed influence factors. Moreover, 71.88% of total difference in inpatient utilization was due to the observed influence factors. Income quantiles (49.57%), health self-assessments (80.91%), and the sex ratio in the community (-102.29%) were significant in the differences in inpatient utilization.
The findings provide important insights into the socioeconomic differences in health service utilization among older rural-to-urban migrant workers and older rural residents in China. These insights urge the government to take full account of the heterogeneity in designing health security system reform and public health interventions targeting vulnerable groups.
中国不同群体之间卫生服务利用差距的扩大已成为一个不容忽视的重要问题。本研究旨在探讨老年农村到城市流动人口与老年农村居民之间卫生服务利用的差异及其原因,并进一步探讨卫生服务利用的社会经济差异。
本研究使用了 2016 年中国劳动力动态调查、2016 年城市统计年鉴和统计公报的数据。根据中国的现状,我们应用了最新的安德森模型。在研究卫生服务利用之前,我们使用了粗化精确匹配来控制混杂因素。匹配后,成功匹配了 2314 名受访者(859 名老年农村到城市流动人口和 1455 名老年农村居民)。我们使用 Fairlie 分解方法分析了老年农村到城市流动人口与农村居民之间卫生服务利用的差异及其来源。
匹配后,老年农村到城市流动人口两周门诊就诊的概率(5.59%)明显低于老年农村居民(7.57%)。老年农村到城市流动人口住院的概率(5.59%)明显低于老年农村居民(9.07%)。总的来说,两周门诊就诊利用率总差异的 17.98%归因于观察到的影响因素。此外,住院利用率总差异的 71.88%归因于观察到的影响因素。收入分位数(49.57%)、健康自评(80.91%)和社区性别比(-102.29%)在住院利用率的差异中具有统计学意义。
这些发现为了解中国老年农村到城市流动人口和老年农村居民之间的社会经济差异对卫生服务利用的影响提供了重要的见解。这些见解敦促政府在设计卫生保障制度改革和针对弱势群体的公共卫生干预措施时充分考虑到异质性。