Crowe Lindsey A, Genecand Léon, Hachulla Anne-Lise, Noble Stéphane, Beghetti Maurice, Vallée Jean-Paul, Lador Frédéric
Division of Radiology, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2022 May 11;11(10):2717. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102717.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to measure cardiac output (CO) non-invasively, which is a paramount parameter in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. We retrospectively compared stroke volume (SV) obtained with MRI (SV) in six localisations against SV measured with thermodilution (TD) (SV) and against each other in 24 patients evaluated in our PH centre using Bland and Altman (BA) agreement analyses, linear correlation, and intraclass correlation (ICC). None of the six tested localisations for SV reached the predetermined criteria for interchangeability with SV, with two standard deviations (2SD) of bias between 24.1 mL/beat and 31.1 mL/beat. The SV methods yielded better agreement when compared against each other than the comparison between SV and SV, with the best 2SD of bias being 13.8 mL/beat. The inter-observer and intra-observer ICCs for CO were excellent (inter-observer ICC between 0.889 and 0.983 and intra-observer ICC between 0.991 and 0.999). We could not confirm the interchangeability of SV with SV based on the predetermined interchangeability criteria. The lack of agreement between MRI and TD might be explained because TD is less precise than previously thought. We evaluated a new method to estimate CO through the pulmonary circulation (COp) in PH patients that may be more precise than the previously tested methods.
磁共振成像(MRI)可用于无创测量心输出量(CO),这是肺动脉高压(PH)患者的一个至关重要的参数。我们回顾性地比较了在六个部位通过MRI获得的每搏输出量(SV)与通过热稀释法(TD)测量的SV,并在我们的PH中心对24例患者进行了Bland和Altman(BA)一致性分析、线性相关性分析以及组内相关性(ICC)分析,比较了这六个部位之间以及它们与TD测量的SV之间的差异。对于SV测试的六个部位中,没有一个达到与TD测量的SV互换的预定标准,偏差的两个标准差(2SD)在24.1 mL/次心跳至31.1 mL/次心跳之间。与SV和TD测量的SV之间的比较相比,六个部位之间的SV方法一致性更好,最佳偏差2SD为13.8 mL/次心跳。CO的观察者间和观察者内ICC均极佳(观察者间ICC在0.889至0.983之间,观察者内ICC在0.991至0.999之间)。基于预定的互换标准,我们无法证实MRI测量的SV与TD测量的SV之间的互换性。MRI和TD之间缺乏一致性可能是因为TD不如之前认为的精确。我们评估了一种通过PH患者肺循环估计CO(COp)的新方法,该方法可能比之前测试的方法更精确。