Papadopoulos Kosmas, Tserpes Konstantinos
Laboratory of Technology & Strength of Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece.
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 10;15(10):3423. doi: 10.3390/ma15103423.
In this paper, analytical and numerical models have been developed to compute the stress field and predict fracture of the aluminum/epoxy interface subjected to laser shock loading, in the frame of the investigation of the paint stripping process. An explicit finite element (FE) model combined with the cohesive zone modeling (CZM) method, an analytical stress analysis model, and a spall fracture model have been developed. The numerical model has been calibrated and validated against tests in terms of the stripping pattern, while the analytical models have been compared with the numerical model. The models were combined to generate computational tools for decreasing computational effort. The FE model with the CZM is the most accurate tool although it is the most computationally expensive. The spall fracture model gives trusted estimations of the spall strength of the interface which are very sensitive to the interface thickness and when incorporated into a continuum FE-based damage model can predict the stripping initiation faster than the FE model with the CZM. The analytical stress analysis model can be used to efficiently describe the shock wave propagation into the material system, but it can give only a rough estimation of the tensile stress at the epoxy, which when combined with the spall strength does not give reliable predictions of the stripping initiation. The three models require as input different material properties, some of which are very difficult to determine. Nevertheless, the availability of accurate material parameters and properties of the aluminum, the epoxy, and, especially, their interface can significantly improve the efficiency of the developed models.
在本文中,为了研究涂层剥离过程,已经开发了分析模型和数值模型,用于计算铝/环氧树脂界面在激光冲击载荷作用下的应力场并预测其断裂情况。已经开发了一个结合内聚区模型(CZM)方法的显式有限元(FE)模型、一个分析应力分析模型和一个层裂断裂模型。数值模型已根据剥离模式的测试进行了校准和验证,而分析模型已与数值模型进行了比较。这些模型被结合起来以生成减少计算量的计算工具。带有CZM的有限元模型是最精确的工具,尽管其计算成本最高。层裂断裂模型给出了对界面层裂强度的可靠估计,该强度对界面厚度非常敏感,并且当纳入基于连续体有限元的损伤模型时,它可以比带有CZM的有限元模型更快地预测剥离起始。分析应力分析模型可用于有效地描述冲击波在材料系统中的传播,但它只能对环氧树脂处的拉应力给出粗略估计,当与层裂强度结合时,无法可靠地预测剥离起始。这三个模型需要不同的材料特性作为输入,其中一些特性很难确定。然而,准确的铝、环氧树脂及其界面的材料参数和特性的可用性可以显著提高所开发模型的效率。