Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 May 2;152(17-18). doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30157. eCollection 2022 Apr 25.
The number of reported cases of Legionnaires' disease has increased significantly over the last decade in Switzerland and abroad. Along with the number of cases, the volume of testing has increased as well, which has been partially attributed to a change in awareness of the disease. Yet, while there are numerous guidelines and recommendations for the case management of community-acquired pneumonia, little is known about how physicians in Switzerland perceive and manage Legionnaires' disease.
This study aimed to investigate physicians' awareness of Legionnaires' disease, their information resources and their approach to the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia (and thus Legionnaires' disease). Using a semi-structured interview guide, we conducted in-depth interviews with physicians from different levels of care and from the German-, French- and Italian-speaking regions of Switzerland.
We conducted 46 interviews with physicians from university, cantonal and regional hospitals as well as with general practitioners (GPs) from all three language regions. Overall, the physicians working in hospitals indicated a similar level of awareness of Legionnaires' disease, and comparable diagnosis and treatment approaches. The Legionella urine antigen test (UAT) was reported to be routinely performed in inpatients. In contrast, GPs indicated lower levels of awareness, reflecting the fact that they treat pneumonia cases empirically without identification of the causative agent, in accordance with current guidelines. The value of the diagnostic tests in general and the Legionella UAT in particular was considered to be dependent on the (preferred) antibiotic treatment approach. Some physicians saw the test as redundant, as its result would not influence treatment. This was tied to concerns about the UAT's sensitivity and its limited use for the detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. Lastly, extrinsic constraints, such as financial and time considerations also affected physicians' testing and treatment preferences.
Awareness of Legionnaires' disease is overall high, yet cases are mainly diagnosed and reported by hospitals. Improved diagnostic tools are needed to support physicians in reducing underestimation of Legionnaires' disease and optimise antibiotic stewardship without compromising patient health outcomes.
在过去的十年中,瑞士国内外报告的军团病病例数量显著增加。随着病例数量的增加,检测量也有所增加,这部分归因于人们对该病的认识有所提高。然而,尽管有许多针对社区获得性肺炎的病例管理指南和建议,但对于瑞士医生如何感知和管理军团病却知之甚少。
本研究旨在调查医生对军团病的认识、他们的信息资源以及他们对肺炎(因此也是军团病)的诊断和治疗方法。我们使用半结构化访谈指南,对来自瑞士德语、法语和意大利语区不同层次医疗保健机构的医生进行了深入访谈。
我们对来自大学、州和地区医院的医生以及来自这三个语言区的全科医生进行了 46 次访谈。总的来说,医院工作的医生表示对军团病的认识水平相似,诊断和治疗方法也相似。尿抗原检测(UAT)被报告常规用于住院患者。相比之下,全科医生表示他们的认识水平较低,这反映了他们根据目前的指南,凭经验治疗肺炎病例,而不识别病原体的实际情况。一般来说,诊断测试的价值,特别是尿抗原检测的价值,取决于(首选)抗生素治疗方法。一些医生认为该检测多余,因为其结果不会影响治疗。这与对检测的敏感性和对军团菌 1 血清群检测的有限用途的担忧有关。最后,外在限制因素,如财务和时间考虑,也影响了医生的检测和治疗偏好。
总体而言,对军团病的认识水平较高,但主要由医院诊断和报告。需要改进诊断工具,以帮助医生减少对军团病的低估,优化抗生素管理,而不会影响患者的健康结果。