Ji Menglei, Wang Shanshan, Peng Chun, Li Jinlin
School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montréal & GERAD, Montréal H3T 2A7, Canada.
Comput Ind Eng. 2022 Jul;169:108226. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108226. Epub 2022 May 13.
The current pandemic of COVID-19 has caused significant strain on medical center resources, which are the main plac healthcare managers to make an effective assignment plan for the patients and telemedical doctors when providing telemedicine services. Motivated by this, we present the first comprehensive study of a two-stage robust telemedicine assignment problem when three different sources of uncertainty are incorporated, including uncertain service duration, no-show behaviours of both patients and telemedical doctors. From an algorithmic viewpoint, we propose an efficient nested column-and-constraint generation (C&CG) solution scheme that decomposes the model into an outer level problem and an inner level problem. Our results show that we can solve the problems of realistic sizes within a reasonable time (e.g., up to 100 patients, 10 telemedical doctors, and 200 scenarios within two hours). On the empirical side, we demonstrate how the hyper-parameters make a balance between cost management and the coverage level of the served patients in the presence of three different sources of uncertainty. Our comparison with a two-stage stochastic programming model implies that our model is not overly conservative and seems to provide a relatively cheaper modeling alternative that requires much less information support when hedging against three different sources of uncertainty under a worst-case situation.
当前的新冠疫情给医疗中心资源带来了巨大压力,这促使医疗管理者在提供远程医疗服务时,为患者和远程医生制定有效的分配计划。受此启发,我们首次对包含三种不同不确定性来源(包括不确定的服务时长、患者和远程医生的爽约行为)的两阶段鲁棒远程医疗分配问题进行了全面研究。从算法角度来看,我们提出了一种高效的嵌套列与约束生成(C&CG)解决方案,将模型分解为一个外层问题和一个内层问题。我们的结果表明,我们能够在合理时间内(例如,两小时内解决多达100名患者、10名远程医生和200种场景的问题)解决实际规模的问题。在实证方面,我们展示了在存在三种不同不确定性来源的情况下,超参数如何在成本管理和服务患者的覆盖水平之间取得平衡。我们与两阶段随机规划模型的比较表明,我们的模型并非过于保守,似乎提供了一种相对更便宜的建模选择,在最坏情况下应对三种不同不确定性来源时,所需的信息支持要少得多。