Division of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Division of Endocrinology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 12;13:834456. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.834456. eCollection 2022.
It is unequivocally recognized that thyroid nodules are frequently detected in the adult population and mostly characterized by benign lesions (up to 70% of them), with only 5%-15% malignant lesions. The evaluation of thyroid lesions with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) represents one of the first and most useful diagnostic tools in the definition of their nature. Despite the fact that the majority of thyroid lesions are correctly diagnosed as either benign (70%-75%) or malignant (5%-10%) entities, the remaining nodules (20%-25%) represent the "gray zone" of follicular lesions, which belong to indeterminate categories, according to the different classification systems. This indeterminate group of lesions includes both benign and malignant entities, which cannot be easily discriminate with morphology alone. In these last decades, the increasing role of molecular testings, feasibly performed on cytological material combined with the discoveries of specific genetic alterations in the field of thyroid pathology, has opened the pace to their more accurate and specific contribution on cytology. In fact, in 2015, in the revised management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and well-differentiated thyroid cancers (WDTCs), the American Thyroid Association (ATA) confirmed the performance of molecular testing in thyroid indeterminate cytology, and the same performance was addressed in recent update of the management of thyroid nodules in the second edition of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC). In the current review, we discuss the role of molecular tests for the different thyroid diagnostic categories of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology, mostly focusing our attention on the follicular and indeterminate lesions.
毫无疑问,甲状腺结节在成年人群中经常被发现,且大多以良性病变为特征(其中 70%为良性病变),仅有 5%-15%为恶性病变。细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)评估甲状腺病变是确定其性质的最早和最有用的诊断工具之一。尽管大多数甲状腺病变被正确诊断为良性(70%-75%)或恶性(5%-10%)实体,但其余结节(20%-25%)代表滤泡性病变的“灰色地带”,根据不同的分类系统,这些病变属于不确定类别。这个不确定的病变群体包括良性和恶性实体,仅通过形态学无法轻易区分。在过去几十年中,分子检测的作用不断增加,这些检测可在细胞学标本上进行,同时结合甲状腺病理学领域中特定遗传改变的发现,为细胞学提供了更准确和具体的贡献。事实上,2015 年,在修订的甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌(WDTC)患者管理指南中,美国甲状腺协会(ATA)确认了在甲状腺不确定细胞学中进行分子检测的性能,并且在甲状腺滤泡性和不确定病变中,这一性能在贝塞斯达系统报告甲状腺细胞病理学(TBSRTC)第二版中最近更新的甲状腺结节管理中得到了应用。在本综述中,我们讨论了分子检测在贝塞斯达系统报告甲状腺细胞病理学的不同甲状腺诊断类别中的作用,主要关注滤泡性和不确定病变。