• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为证据类型的纤维的法医学文献的科学计量分析:获取与数据可用性。

Scientometric analysis of the forensic science literature for fibre as an evidence type: Access and data availability.

作者信息

Galais Virginie, Fleming Holly, Nic Daéid Niamh, Ménard Hervé

机构信息

Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 May 17;5:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100269. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100269
PMID:35634573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9133568/
Abstract

The large volume of information available within citation databases has become a challenge to manage and distil in all areas of research. In this study, a scientometric approach has been applied to fibres as an evidence type using information contained in Scopus and Web of Science. A comparison was also made with the references listed in the INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium Science (IFSMS) reports (2004-2019) where only a limited number of documents were common with the citation databases, illustrating the value of the IFSMS reports. Finally, this study also highlights that data availability and location are generally omitted in publications. The forensic science community has an opportunity to change this culture and lead the way in making their data available, aligning with the ideals of fairness, openness and transparency of the underpinning data upon which scientific developments are based.

摘要

引文数据库中大量可用信息已成为各研究领域管理和提炼的一项挑战。在本研究中,一种科学计量方法已应用于纤维这一证据类型,使用了Scopus和Web of Science中包含的信息。还与国际刑警组织国际法医科学管理人员研讨会科学报告(2004 - 2019年)中列出的参考文献进行了比较,其中与引文数据库仅有少量文献相同,这说明了国际刑警组织国际法医科学管理人员研讨会报告的价值。最后,本研究还强调,数据的可用性和位置在出版物中通常被忽略。法医学界有机会改变这种文化,并带头提供其数据,符合科学发展所基于的基础数据的公平、开放和透明的理想。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/3e6e91baca2e/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/3e6cb3bad817/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/20438296d6ff/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/ab7c7c121a18/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/85a7e8585a62/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/f51041537681/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/3e6e91baca2e/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/3e6cb3bad817/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/20438296d6ff/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/ab7c7c121a18/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/85a7e8585a62/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/f51041537681/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/9133568/3e6e91baca2e/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientometric analysis of the forensic science literature for fibre as an evidence type: Access and data availability.作为证据类型的纤维的法医学文献的科学计量分析:获取与数据可用性。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 May 17;5:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100269. eCollection 2022.
2
Interpol review of fibres and textiles 2016-2019.国际刑警组织2016 - 2019年纤维与纺织品审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Mar 10;2:481-488. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.014. eCollection 2020.
3
Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine.法医学和法医学领域高被引科学家的科学计量学评估。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Mar;135(2):701-707. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02491-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references-a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics.视角的转变:从被引参考文献角度看文献计量学——文献计量学中被引参考文献评价方法的文献综述
Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):1397-1415. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2111-2. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
5
Interpol review of questioned documents 2016-2019.国际刑警组织2016 - 2019年可疑文件审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Apr 12;2:429-441. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.012. eCollection 2020.
6
Analysis of Forensic Sciences Literature in SCIE from 2008 to 2017.2008年至2017年SCIE收录的法医学文献分析
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb;35(1):30-38. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Interpol review of detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues 2016-2019.国际刑警组织对2016 - 2019年爆炸物及爆炸物残留物的检测与特征分析回顾
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 17;2:670-700. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.020. eCollection 2020.
8
Developmental disabilities across the world: A scientometric review from 1936 to 2020.全球发育障碍:1936 年至 2020 年的科学计量学综述。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Oct;117:104031. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104031. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.国际刑警组织对2016 - 2019年法医生物学和法医DNA分型的审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Feb 20;2:352-367. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.12.002. eCollection 2020.
10
Scientometric study of academic publications on antioxidative herbal medicines in type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病中抗氧化草药医学学术出版物的科学计量学研究
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2016 Oct 21;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s40200-016-0273-3. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the evidential value of textile fibres Part 2: Application of a database-driven fibre comparison strategy to a cold-case investigation.增强纤维物证价值 第 2 部分:基于数据库驱动的纤维比对策略在冷案调查中的应用。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Aug;325:110894. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110894. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine.法医学和法医学领域高被引科学家的科学计量学评估。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Mar;135(2):701-707. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02491-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
[Analysis of the publications of the journal «Forensic medical examination» on the problem of identification from 1980 to 2018].
[《法医学鉴定》杂志1980年至2018年关于身份鉴定问题的出版物分析]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2020;63(2):58-63. doi: 10.17116/sudmed20206302158.
4
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.哪些学术搜索系统适用于系统评价或荟萃分析?评估 Google Scholar、PubMed 和其他 26 个资源的检索质量。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):181-217. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1378. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Enhancing the evidential value of textile fibres: Part 1: Development of a spectral database and evaluative comparison strategy.提高纺织纤维的证据价值:第1部分:光谱数据库的开发和评估比较策略。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jun;287:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Degradation patterns of natural and synthetic textiles on a soil surface during summer and winter seasons studied using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy.利用衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱(ATR-FTIR)研究夏季和冬季自然及合成纺织品在土壤表面的降解模式。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2017 Oct 5;185:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
The analysis of colored acrylic, cotton, and wool textile fibers using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Part 2: comparison with the traditional methods of fiber examination.使用显微拉曼光谱法分析彩色腈纶、棉和羊毛纺织纤维。第2部分:与传统纤维检测方法的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 2015 May;60(3):712-20. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12654. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
8
The discrimination of colored acrylic, cotton, and wool textile fibers using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Part 1: in situ detection and characterization of dyes.利用显微拉曼光谱法鉴别有色腈纶、棉和羊毛纺织纤维。第1部分:染料的原位检测与表征。
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Nov;58(6):1593-600. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12298. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
9
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.PubMed、Scopus、科学网和谷歌学术的比较:优势与不足
FASEB J. 2008 Feb;22(2):338-42. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
10
Acute toxicity of the combustion products from various kinds of fibers.各类纤维燃烧产物的急性毒性。
Z Rechtsmed. 1975 Sep 5;76(1):11-26. doi: 10.1007/BF02116793.