Department of Systematic Theology and Ethics, University of Vienna.
Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna.
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2281-2291. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2065736. Epub 2022 May 30.
This article critically examines the four patterns of shared medical decision making (physician-dominated; physician-defined, patient-made; patient-defined, physician-made; and patient-dominated) suggested by Lippa et al. (2017). The aim of the study is to challenge these patterns with a new data set of conversations between physicians and cancer patients in a hospital ward. We recorded 13 physician-patient-conversations during the medical round in an Austrian hospital, which in total lasted about 1.5 h (language: German). We then categorized the medical decisions found in the data following Lippa et al.'s instructions and further analyzed them with a fine-grained linguistic approach. The study revealed no patient-dominated decisions and one decision, which could not be categorized with one of the patterns. Results from the linguistic approach call into question the generalizability, distinctiveness and validity of the patterns. Finally, the relationship between shared decision making and clinical distributed cognition is discussed.
这篇文章批判性地审视了 Lippa 等人(2017 年)提出的四种共享医疗决策模式(医生主导型;医生定义、患者决策型;患者定义、医生决策型;和患者主导型)。本研究的目的是用一组新的医生和癌症患者在病房中的对话数据来挑战这些模式。我们在奥地利一家医院的医疗查房中记录了 13 个医患对话,总时长约 1.5 小时(语言:德语)。然后,我们根据 Lippa 等人的指示对数据中的医疗决策进行分类,并进一步采用细粒度的语言方法对其进行分析。研究结果表明,没有发现患者主导型决策,只有一个决策无法归入其中一种模式。语言方法的结果对模式的普遍性、独特性和有效性提出了质疑。最后,讨论了共享决策制定与临床分布式认知之间的关系。