• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤稿后系统综述仍被频繁引用:一项引文分析

Retracted systematic reviews continued to be frequently cited: a citation analysis.

机构信息

Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;149:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.013
PMID:35636592
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To survey the citations of retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) in scientific literature.

METHODS

We searched the Web of Science and Google Scholar from their inception to 30 April 2020 to find the citations of 153 previously identified retracted non-Cochrane SRs. We calculated the numbers of citations before and after retraction separately. We also described how the citation addressed the retraction and how it was used in the article.

RESULTS

A We identified 954 citations of 128 retracted SRs. The number of retracted SRs and citations reached the peak in 2014 and 2016, respectively, and the majority of the citations (n = 580, 60.8%) were in articles published after the SR was retracted. The mean number of citation per retracted SRs was 7.5. 2.6 before and 4.5 after the publication of the retraction notice. Twenty-nine (5.0%) citations indicated the retraction of the SRs in the reference section. Nine of these citations supported the retracted SR's results, and 15 disagreed with them.

CONCLUSION

Retracted SRs continue to be cited after the publication of the retraction notice. Standardized methods are needed to guide the management of retractions and avoid inappropriate citations of retracted articles.

摘要

背景与目的

调查已撤回的非 Cochrane 系统评价(SR)在科学文献中的被引情况。

方法

我们从建库至 2020 年 4 月 30 日,在 Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 中检索了此前确定的 153 篇已撤回的非 Cochrane SRs 的被引情况。我们分别计算了撤回前后的被引数量。还描述了引用如何处理撤回以及在文章中如何使用。

结果

我们共发现 128 篇撤回 SRs 的 954 条引用。撤回 SRs 和引文数量分别在 2014 年和 2016 年达到峰值,并且大多数引文(n=580,60.8%)发表在撤回通知发布后。每篇撤回 SR 的平均引文数为 7.5 篇,发表前为 2.6 篇,发表后为 4.5 篇。在参考文献部分有 29 条(5.0%)引文表明撤回了 SR。这些引文中有 9 条支持撤回的 SR 结果,15 条则不同意。

结论

在撤回通知发布后,撤回的 SRs 仍被引用。需要标准化的方法来指导撤回管理,以避免对撤回文章的不当引用。

相似文献

1
Retracted systematic reviews continued to be frequently cited: a citation analysis.撤稿后系统综述仍被频繁引用:一项引文分析
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;149:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions.健康与生命科学研究中的科研不端行为:巴西机构撤回文献的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0214272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214272. eCollection 2019.
3
Citations of microRNA Biomarker Articles That Were Retracted: A Systematic Review.被撤回的 miRNA 生物标志物文章的引用:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243173. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3173.
4
Assessment of Citations of the Retracted Article by Wakefield et al With Fraudulent Claims of an Association Between Vaccination and Autism.评估威克菲尔德等人发表的被撤回的论文的引用情况,该论文存在与疫苗接种和自闭症之间存在关联的欺诈性说法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915552. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15552.
5
An analysis of retractions of dental publications.对牙科出版物撤回的分析。
J Dent. 2018 Dec;79:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
6
Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews.撤回的药学系统评价文献。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):47-55. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1280.
7
The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry.被撤回的牙科学文献持续被引述。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;108(3):389-397. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.824.
8
For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature.由于研究不端行为而撤回的遗传学文章在科学文献中活跃了多长时间,具有什么相关性。
Account Res. 2021 Jul;28(5):280-296. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1835479. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
9
Continued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature-Do We Have a Problem?继续引用已撤回的放射肿瘤学文献——我们有问题吗?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1036-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review.医学领域撤回的非Cochrane系统评价需要更多考量:一项系统评价
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study.调查试验撤稿对医疗证据生态系统的影响(活力研究I):回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2025 Apr 23;389:e082068. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082068.
2
How the National Library of Medicine should evolve in an era of artificial intelligence.国立医学图书馆在人工智能时代应如何发展。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):968-970. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf041.
3
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews.引用更新的和共同发表的 Cochrane 方法学评论。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 14;12(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w.