• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾部分切除术和根治性肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾肿瘤。并发症和生存的比较分析。

Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in cT1 renal tumors. Comparative analysis of complications and survival.

机构信息

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jul-Aug;46(6):340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.11.005. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.11.005
PMID:35637154
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys and single renal tumor cT1 treated in our center between 2005 and 2018 by laparoscopic PN or RN.

RESULTS

372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. RN was performed in 156 (41.9%) patients and PN in 216 (58.1%). Clavien Dindo III-V complications were observed in 10 (4,6%) PN and 6 (3,9%) RN patients (p = 0.75). The comorbidity Charlson index (CCI) was identified as an independent predictor variable of complications (p = 0.02) and surgical approach did not affect multivariate analysis. Estimated overall survival (OS) was 81.2% and 56.8% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 90.2% and 75.7% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.0001). Obesity (HR 2.77, p = 0.01), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 3.69, p = 0.001) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m at discharge (HR 1.87, p = 0.03) were identified as predictors of overall mortality. Nephrectomy approach showed no influence on OS. Estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.1% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 93.5% and 83.6% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic PN is not inferior to RN in terms of oncologic and surgical safety in cT1 RCC. Nephrectomy approach did not influence patient OS, however, obesity, CCI ≥ 3 and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m at discharge did behave as predictors.

摘要

介绍和目的

比较腹腔镜部分肾切除术(PN)和根治性肾切除术(RN)治疗 cT1 肾细胞癌(RCC)术后并发症和生存的差异。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 2005 年至 2018 年在我们中心接受腹腔镜 PN 或 RN 治疗的双侧肾脏和单发肾肿瘤 cT1 患者。

结果

372 例患者符合研究纳入标准。156 例(41.9%)患者行 RN,216 例(58.1%)患者行 PN。PN 组中有 10 例(4.6%)和 RN 组中有 6 例(3.9%)患者发生 Clavien Dindo III-V 级并发症(p=0.75)。合并症 Charlson 指数(CCI)被确定为并发症的独立预测变量(p=0.02),而手术方式在多变量分析中没有影响。RN 组患者的总体生存率(OS)分别为 5 年和 10 年的 81.2%和 56.8%,PN 组分别为 90.2%和 75.7%(p=0.0001)。肥胖(HR 2.77,p=0.01)、CCI≥3(HR 3.69,p=0.001)和出院时肾小球滤过率(GFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m(HR 1.87,p=0.03)被确定为总体死亡率的预测因素。肾切除术方式对 OS 没有影响。RN 组患者的无复发生存率(RFS)分别为 5 年和 10 年的 86.1%和 74.0%,PN 组患者的 RFS 分别为 93.5%和 83.6%(p=0.22)。

结论

在 cT1 RCC 中,腹腔镜 PN 在肿瘤学和手术安全性方面并不逊于 RN。肾切除术方式并未影响患者的 OS,但肥胖、CCI≥3 和出院时 GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m 是死亡率的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in cT1 renal tumors. Comparative analysis of complications and survival.腹腔镜肾部分切除术和根治性肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾肿瘤。并发症和生存的比较分析。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jul-Aug;46(6):340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.11.005. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment.腹腔镜肾部分切除术和根治性肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾肿瘤患者的肾功能演变。肾功能损害的预测因素。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.05.003. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in pT3a Pathologically Upstaged Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis.pT3a 病理分期上调的肾细胞癌行根治性和部分肾切除术的肿瘤学及功能结局:一项多机构分析
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Dec;18(6):e723-e729. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Evolution of renal function in patients with CT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment.CT1期肾肿瘤患者行腹腔镜肾部分切除术和根治性肾切除术后肾功能的演变。肾功能损害的预测因素。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.05.001.
5
Radical Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾癌。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):825-832. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2 期临床肾肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive partial versus minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for cT1-2/N0/M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.cT1-2/N0/M0期透明细胞肾细胞癌行微创部分肾切除术与微创根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):789-794. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1923-2. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
8
Oncological and functional efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma stages ≥cT1b: a single institution, matched analysis.≥cT1b期肾细胞癌中行保留肾单位手术与根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学及功能疗效:单中心配对分析
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(1):48-57. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1611. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Comprehensive Management of Renal Masses in Solitary Kidneys.孤立肾肾肿瘤的综合管理。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;6(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
10
Partial vs Radical Nephrectomy for T1-T2 Renal Masses in the Elderly: Comparison of Complications, Renal Function, and Oncologic Outcomes.老年T1-T2期肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的比较:并发症、肾功能及肿瘤学结局分析
Urology. 2017 Feb;100:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.047. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Strategies in Renal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Partial vs. Radical Nephrectomy Outcomes Across Tumor Stages.肾癌的手术策略:一项关于不同肿瘤分期下部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术结果的荟萃分析
Qatar Med J. 2025 Jun 9;2025(2):54. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.54. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of different nephrectomy types on M0 renal cell carcinoma outcomes in a propensity score matching and deep learning study.基于倾向评分匹配和深度学习研究的不同肾切除术式对 M0 期肾细胞癌结局的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 11;14(1):27571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79070-2.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Renal Cancers-In Search for the Ideal Tumour.
超声引导下经皮热消融治疗肾癌——寻找理想肿瘤
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 14;15(2):518. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020518.