Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚某地区重症监护病房呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)诊断的多种定义的回顾性评估。

A retrospective evaluation of multiple definitions for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) diagnosis in an Australian regional intensive care unit.

机构信息

Mackay Base Hospital, Australia.

出版信息

Infect Dis Health. 2022 Nov;27(4):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia is a common complication of invasively ventilated patients with significant and underestimated morbidity and mortality. Defining VAP cases is greatly varied as many definitions are used with varying success and sensitivity. This study evaluates VAP detection using four definitions in a regional Australian Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

METHODS

A cohort of patients admitted to ICU at the Mackay Base Hospital from April 1st 2020 to March 31st 2021, who had endo-tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 h were identified. Each patient was examined across four common definitions of VAP. Head-to-head analysis of definitions was pursued to determine the most suitable definition. The four definitions used included: An Australian VAP definition, the CDC VAP definition, the Mackay Base Hospital Local Protocol and a Physician Decision Arm.

RESULTS

66 unique patients and 2 re-intubations were identified during the data collection window. The local protocol identified 8 cases of VAP. The Australian VAP definition identified 6 additional cases and 0 missed cases compared to the local protocol. The CDC definition missed 4 cases and identified 4 additional cases compared to the local protocol. Finally, the physician arm identified 10 cases including 8 additional cases and missed 6 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

VAP is an extremely difficult clinical condition to define and detect. Definitions have varied accuracy and suffer logistically for application to the individual patient. Refined criteria for diagnosis of VAP is greatly needed and its prevalence in intensive care units likely remains uncertain.

摘要

背景

呼吸机相关性肺炎是接受有创通气治疗的患者常见且发病率和死亡率被低估的并发症。呼吸机相关性肺炎病例的定义差异很大,因为许多定义的应用成功率和敏感度各不相同。本研究评估了在澳大利亚一个地区重症监护病房(ICU)使用四种定义来检测呼吸机相关性肺炎。

方法

2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间,在麦凯基地医院 ICU 住院、接受气管内插管和机械通气超过 48 小时的患者被确定为研究对象。每位患者都根据四种常见的呼吸机相关性肺炎定义进行了检查。对这些定义进行了头对头的分析,以确定最适合的定义。使用的四个定义包括:澳大利亚呼吸机相关性肺炎定义、CDC 呼吸机相关性肺炎定义、麦凯基地医院本地方案和医生决策组。

结果

在数据收集期间,共确定了 66 名独特的患者和 2 例再插管。本地方案识别出 8 例呼吸机相关性肺炎。与本地方案相比,澳大利亚呼吸机相关性肺炎定义额外识别出 6 例病例,未漏诊任何病例。CDC 定义漏诊了 4 例病例,但额外识别出 4 例病例。最后,医生决策组识别出 10 例病例,包括 8 例额外病例和 6 例漏诊病例。

结论

呼吸机相关性肺炎是一种非常难以定义和检测的临床情况。各种定义的准确性存在差异,在应用于个体患者时在操作上存在困难。因此,非常需要制定更精确的呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断标准,而重症监护病房中呼吸机相关性肺炎的患病率可能仍不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验