• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言、意义与度量:坦桑尼亚社区对体罚的看法与经验,以及儿童保护和儿童权利领域的变化。

Language, meaning and measure: Community perspectives and experiences of physical punishments and the transforming child protection and child rights landscapes in Tanzania.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105663. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105663. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105663
PMID:35640348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade Tanzania has become recognized as a regional leader in addressing issues of violence affecting children. Despite global partnerships and national initiatives, physical punishments remain legally sanctioned and broadly socially supported as part of responsible childrearing.

OBJECTIVE

This research aimed to gain insights into community perspectives and experiences of physical punishments in children's upbringings and how community derived meaning and measurement of particular acts relate with global rights-based conceptualizations of physical violence against children.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Fourteen months of ethnographic research was conducted primarily in and around a peri-urban community in northwest Tanzania. Interviews with national- and global-level children's rights and safety representatives were conducted in Dar-es-Salaam. Twenty-four, school-going girls and boys (ages 8-12) and 53 adults directly participated in study activities.

METHODS

Data collection methods included participant observation, participatory workshops (9), semi-structured interviews (36) and document reviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

Data revealed ongoing debate regarding the use of physical punishments in children's upbringings and their association with violence. Resistance to the global children's rights promoted discourse of complete elimination of physical punishment of children manifested as avoidance, negotiation and rejection. Corporal punishment proved a particularly problematic term.

CONCLUSIONS

Child protection and children's rights are dynamic systems, vernacularized based on unique regional histories and ongoing social change. Prioritization of contextualized and dynamic constructions of children's wellbeing and safety can support the development of sustainable protection systems that support the safety and development of children and families in local communities.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,坦桑尼亚已成为解决影响儿童暴力问题的地区领导者。尽管有全球合作伙伴关系和国家倡议,但作为负责任育儿的一部分,体罚仍然在法律上得到认可,并得到广泛的社会支持。

目的

本研究旨在深入了解社区对儿童养育过程中体罚的看法和经验,以及社区对特定行为的意义和衡量标准如何与全球基于权利的针对儿童身体暴力的概念化相关联。

参与者和设置

在坦桑尼亚西北部的一个城郊社区及其周边地区进行了为期 14 个月的民族志研究。在达累斯萨拉姆对国家和全球儿童权利和安全代表进行了访谈。24 名上学的男孩和女孩(8-12 岁)和 53 名成年人直接参与了研究活动。

方法

数据收集方法包括参与观察、参与式研讨会(9 次)、半结构化访谈(36 次)和文件审查。使用主题分析来分析数据。

结果

数据显示,关于在儿童养育中使用体罚以及其与暴力的关联问题,人们仍在进行辩论。对完全消除体罚儿童的全球儿童权利话语的抵制表现为回避、协商和拒绝。体罚被证明是一个特别成问题的术语。

结论

儿童保护和儿童权利是动态系统,根据独特的区域历史和持续的社会变化进行本土化。优先考虑儿童福祉和安全的本土化和动态构建,可以支持建立可持续的保护系统,从而支持当地社区儿童和家庭的安全和发展。

相似文献

1
Language, meaning and measure: Community perspectives and experiences of physical punishments and the transforming child protection and child rights landscapes in Tanzania.语言、意义与度量:坦桑尼亚社区对体罚的看法与经验,以及儿童保护和儿童权利领域的变化。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105663. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105663. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
What works to prevent violence against children in Afghanistan? Findings of an interrupted time series evaluation of a school-based peace education and community social norms change intervention in Afghanistan.在阿富汗,哪些措施可以有效预防儿童暴力?对阿富汗基于学校的和平教育和社区社会规范改变干预措施进行的一项中断时间序列评估的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 6;14(8):e0220614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220614. eCollection 2019.
3
Recognizing the child's right to protection from physical violence: An update on progress and a call to action.认识到儿童免受身体暴力侵害的权利:进展更新和行动呼吁。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 1):104297. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104297. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Experiences of violence and deficits in academic achievement among urban primary school children in Jamaica.牙买加城市小学儿童的暴力经历与学业成绩缺陷
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 May;33(5):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.05.011. Epub 2009 May 29.
5
Perceptions of Adolescents and Caregivers of Corporal Punishment: A Qualitative Study Among Indo-Caribbean in Suriname.青少年及体罚照料者的认知:苏里南印度加勒比人群的定性研究
Violence Vict. 2018 Aug;33(4):686-707. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00222.
6
Children's experiences of corporal punishment: A qualitative study in an urban township of South Africa.儿童的体罚经历:南非一个城市乡镇的定性研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Oct;48:131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
Politicizing Children's Play: A Community Photovoice Process to Transform a School Playground.将儿童游戏政治化:一项改造学校操场的社区摄影发声项目
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jul 1;78(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050435.
8
Assessment of whole school approach intervention to reduce violence affecting children in and around schools in Kenya and Tanzania: protocol for a before-and-after, mixed-methods pilot study.评估肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚全面学校干预措施以减少影响校内和校周围儿童暴力行为:一项前后混合方法试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 6;12(5):e055231. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055231.
9
Motivations and perspectives on the use of corporal punishment at home: A qualitative study of Ghanaian parents.在家中使用体罚的动机和观点:加纳父母的定性研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Nov;157:107036. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107036. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
10
Parental Beliefs and Actual Use of Corporal Punishment, School Violence and Bullying, and Depression in Early Adolescence.父母的信念与实际体罚、校园暴力和欺凌行为、以及青少年早期抑郁的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;18(12):6270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126270.

引用本文的文献

1
What do we know about how children and adolescents conceptualise violence? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies from sub-Saharan Africa.我们对儿童和青少年如何概念化暴力了解多少?来自撒哈拉以南非洲的定性研究的系统回顾和元综合。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0304240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304240. eCollection 2024.
2
Addressing violence against children: A case review in the state of Qatar.应对儿童暴力:卡塔尔的案例审查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;10:859325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859325. eCollection 2022.