Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8900 Torgarden, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, P.O. Box 22 Nygårdstangen, N-5838, Bergen, Norway.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115083. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115083. Epub 2022 May 26.
European health reforms during the last decades have strengthened patient rights and introduced choice, competition and financial incentives in a sector that has typically been state-directed and centrally controlled. The marketisation of health care has also drawn out profit and introduced private provision. The main argument behind this trend is that market competition will improve service quality and deliver health services more efficiently. Such reforms often fall under the umbrella of New Public Management (NPM), and there is a lack of empirical research on their effects. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the association between healthcare marketisation and health system outcomes across European nations. In order to measure a country's degree of healthcare marketisation we employed indicators of healthcare decommodification. The concept refers to the extent to which an individual's access to healthcare is dependent upon their market position and the extent to which a country's provision of health is independent from the market. These indicators are three measures that assess the financing, provision and coverage of the private sector, and thus reflects the varied role of the market in a health care system: private health care expenditure as amount of GDP, private hospital beds as amount of total hospital bed stock, and public healthcare coverage. As indicator of health system outcome, we employed a measure that has not previously been investigated in the context of healthcare marketisation: satisfaction with health care system. We used multilevel analyses on five waves (2009-2017) of the biannual European Social Survey (ESS), with our final models including more than 120,000 individuals from 21 countries. Our methodological approach allowed us to study both cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships. The strongest substantial associations were between coverage and satisfaction, with high public healthcare coverage being associated with higher satisfaction.
过去几十年,欧洲的医疗改革加强了患者的权利,并在原本由国家主导和集中控制的医疗领域引入了选择、竞争和经济激励。医疗保健的市场化也带来了利润,并引入了私人供应。这种趋势的主要论点是,市场竞争将提高服务质量,并更有效地提供医疗服务。此类改革通常属于新公共管理(NPM)的范畴,但其效果缺乏实证研究。本文旨在研究欧洲各国医疗市场化与卫生系统成果之间的关联。为了衡量一个国家的医疗市场化程度,我们使用了医疗去商品化的指标。这个概念是指个人获得医疗保健的程度取决于他们的市场地位,以及一个国家提供卫生服务的程度是否独立于市场。这些指标是评估私营部门融资、提供和覆盖范围的三个措施,因此反映了市场在医疗体系中的不同作用:私人医疗保健支出占 GDP 的比例、私人医院病床占总医院病床存量的比例以及公共医疗保健覆盖范围。作为卫生系统成果的指标,我们使用了一个以前在医疗市场化背景下没有被调查过的措施:对医疗保健系统的满意度。我们在欧洲社会调查(ESS)的五个波次(2009-2017 年)上使用了多层次分析,我们的最终模型包括来自 21 个国家的 120000 多人。我们的方法允许我们研究横断面和纵向关系。覆盖范围和满意度之间存在最强的实质性关联,高公共医疗覆盖范围与更高的满意度相关。