Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Am Heart J. 2022 Sep;251:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 May 29.
Clinical guidelines recommend titration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and beta-blockers among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to maximally tolerated doses. Patient characteristics associated with dose titration and clinical outcomes subsequent to dose titration remain poorly characterized.
Among 1999 ambulatory patients with chronic HFrEF in the HF-ACTION trial, use and dosing of ACEi and evidence-based beta-blockers were examined at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with dose escalation (medication initation or dosing increase) or dose de-escalation (medication discontinuation or dosing decrease). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine associations between dose trajectory group (stable target, stable sub-target, dose escalation, and dose de-escalation) and subsequent mortality and hospitalization outcomes.
For both ACEi and beta-blockers, hospitalization for heart failure in the 6 months prior to enrollment (odds ratio [OR] 2.32 [95% confidence interval 1.58-3.42]) for ACEi; 1.42 [1.05-1.9] for beta-blockers) and higher systolic blood pressure (OR 1.01 [1.00-1.03] per 1 mmHg increase for ACEi; 1.01 [1.00-1.02] for beta-blockers) were associated with dose escalation. Hospitalization 6 months prior to enrollment for any cause (including HF or non-HF causes) was associated with dose de-escalation (OR 1.60 [1.14-2.25] for ACEi; 1.67 [1.20-2.33] for beta-blockers). After adjustment for patient characteristics, compared with stable target dosing, dose de-escalation of either medication was associated with greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.64 [1.11-2.42] for ACEi; 1.62 [1.04-2.53] for beta-blockers). Compared with stable target dosing, both dose de-escalation (aHR 1.98 [1.36-2.87]) and stable sub-target dosing (aHR 1.49 [1.18-1.87]) of beta-blockers were associated with greater cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for heart failure.
Among outpatients with chronic HFrEF, patient characteristics including recent hospitalization status and blood pressure were associated with odds of subsequent escalation and de-escalation of ACEi and beta-blocker therapy. Compared with patients receiving guildeline-recommended target doses, dose de-escalation of either medication and sub-target dosing of beta-blockers were associated with greater morbidity and mortality over long-term follow-up.
临床指南建议在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中滴定血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和β受体阻滞剂至最大耐受剂量。与剂量滴定相关的患者特征以及剂量滴定后随后的临床结局仍未得到充分描述。
在 HF-ACTION 试验中,纳入了 1999 例慢性 HFrEF 的门诊患者,在基线和 6 个月随访时检查 ACEi 和基于证据的β受体阻滞剂的使用和剂量。多变量逻辑回归模型用于评估与剂量升级(药物起始或剂量增加)或剂量降级(药物停药或剂量减少)相关的因素。Cox 比例风险回归模型用于检查剂量轨迹组(稳定靶标、稳定亚靶标、剂量升级和剂量降级)与随后的死亡率和住院结局之间的关系。
对于 ACEi 和β受体阻滞剂,在入组前 6 个月内因心力衰竭住院(ACEi 的比值比[OR]为 2.32[95%置信区间 1.58-3.42];β受体阻滞剂为 1.42[1.05-1.9])和较高的收缩压(ACEi 每增加 1mmHg 的 OR 为 1.01[1.00-1.03];β受体阻滞剂为 1.01[1.00-1.02])与剂量升级相关。入组前 6 个月内因任何原因(包括心力衰竭或非心力衰竭原因)住院与剂量降级相关(ACEi 的 OR 为 1.60[1.14-2.25];β受体阻滞剂为 1.67[1.20-2.33])。在调整患者特征后,与稳定靶标剂量相比,两种药物的剂量降级均与全因死亡率增加相关(ACEi 的校正后危险比[aHR]为 1.64[1.11-2.42];β受体阻滞剂为 1.62[1.04-2.53])。与稳定靶标剂量相比,β受体阻滞剂的剂量降级(aHR 为 1.98[1.36-2.87])和稳定亚靶标剂量(aHR 为 1.49[1.18-1.87])均与心血管死亡率或心力衰竭住院增加相关。
在慢性 HFrEF 的门诊患者中,包括近期住院状况和血压在内的患者特征与 ACEi 和β受体阻滞剂治疗随后升级和降级的可能性相关。与接受指南推荐的目标剂量的患者相比,两种药物的剂量降级和β受体阻滞剂的亚靶标剂量与长期随访期间的更高发病率和死亡率相关。