Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Aug;173:134-145. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.021. Epub 2022 May 29.
For radiotherapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors safety margins are applied to address geometrical uncertainties caused by e.g. set-up errors, organ motion and delineation variability. For pediatric patients no standardized margins are defined. Moreover, studies on these geometrical uncertainties are relatively scarce. Therefore, this systematic review presents an overview of organ motion, applied margin sizes and delineation variability in patients <18 years. A search from January 2000 to March 2021 in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Trials Registry Platform resulted in the inclusion of 117 studies reporting on organ motion, margin sizes and/or delineation variability. Studies were heterogeneous concerning age, tumor types, the use of general anesthesia, imaging modalities; image guidance techniques were reported in 39% of the studies. Inter- and intrafractional motion as reported for different organs was largest in cranio-caudal direction and ranged from -9.1 to 10.0 mm and -4.4 to 19.5 mm, respectively. Motion quantification methodologies differed between studies regarding measures of displacement and definitions of motion direction. Reported CTV-PTV margins varied from 3 to 20 mm for both thoracic and abdominal targets, and for spinal and pelvic from 3to 15 mm and 3 to 10 mm, respectively. Studies reported wide variation in interobserver variability of target volume delineation, which may affect dose distributions to both target volumes and organs at risk. Results of this review indicate possible reduction of margin sizes for children, however, wide variation in organ motion and delineation variability caused by differences in methodologies and outcomes hamper the use of standardized margins.
对于胸腹部肿瘤的放射治疗,为了解决由于摆位误差、器官运动和勾画变异性等引起的几何不确定性,会应用安全边缘。对于儿科患者,尚未定义标准化的边缘。此外,关于这些几何不确定性的研究相对较少。因此,本系统评价综述了<18 岁患者的器官运动、应用边缘大小和勾画变异性。从 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月,在 Medline、Embase、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov 和国际临床试验注册平台上进行了检索,纳入了 117 项报告器官运动、边缘大小和/或勾画变异性的研究。这些研究在年龄、肿瘤类型、是否使用全身麻醉、成像方式等方面存在差异;39%的研究报告了图像引导技术。不同器官的跨分次和分次内运动报告最大的是头脚方向,范围分别为-9.1 至 10.0 毫米和-4.4 至 19.5 毫米。研究之间的运动量化方法在位移测量和运动方向定义方面存在差异。报告的胸腹部CTV-PTV 边缘分别为 3 至 20 毫米,脊柱和骨盆分别为 3 至 15 毫米和 3 至 10 毫米。研究报告了靶区勾画的观察者间变异性存在广泛差异,这可能会影响到靶区和危及器官的剂量分布。本综述的结果表明,对于儿童,可能会减少边缘大小,但是由于方法和结果的差异导致器官运动和勾画变异性的广泛变化,阻碍了标准化边缘的应用。