Centre for Neuroscience in Education, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Centre for Neuroscience in Education, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;35:103054. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103054. Epub 2022 May 20.
According to the sensory-neural Temporal Sampling theory of developmental dyslexia, neural sampling of auditory information at slow rates (<10 Hz, related to speech rhythm) is atypical in dyslexic individuals, particularly in the delta band (0.5-4 Hz). Here we examine the underlying neural mechanisms related to atypical sampling using a simple repetitive speech paradigm. Fifty-one children (21 control children [15M, 6F] and 30 children with dyslexia [16M, 14F]) aged 9 years with or without developmental dyslexia watched and listened as a 'talking head' repeated the syllable "ba" every 500 ms, while EEG was recorded. Occasionally a syllable was "out of time", with a temporal delay calibrated individually and adaptively for each child so that it was detected around 79.4% of the time by a button press. Phase consistency in the delta (rate of stimulus delivery), theta (speech-related) and alpha (control) bands was evaluated for each child and each group. Significant phase consistency was found for both groups in the delta and theta bands, demonstrating neural entrainment, but not the alpha band. However, the children with dyslexia showed a different preferred phase and significantly reduced phase consistency compared to control children, in the delta band only. Analysis of pre- and post-stimulus angular velocity of group preferred phases revealed that the children in the dyslexic group showed an atypical response in the delta band only. The delta-band pre-stimulus angular velocity (-130 ms to 0 ms) for the dyslexic group appeared to be significantly faster compared to the control group. It is concluded that neural responding to simple beat-based stimuli may provide a unique neural marker of developmental dyslexia. The automatic nature of this neural response may enable new tools for diagnosis, as well as opening new avenues for remediation.
根据发展性阅读障碍的感觉神经时间采样理论,阅读障碍个体的听觉信息神经采样率较慢(<10 Hz,与语音节奏有关)是异常的,尤其是在 delta 频段(0.5-4 Hz)。在这里,我们使用简单的重复语音范式来检查与非典型采样相关的潜在神经机制。共有 51 名儿童(21 名对照组儿童[15 名男性,6 名女性]和 30 名阅读障碍儿童[16 名男性,14 名女性])参与了这项研究,他们年龄在 9 岁左右,患有或不患有发展性阅读障碍。这些儿童观看并聆听一个“说话头”以 500 毫秒的间隔重复音节“ba”,同时记录脑电图。偶尔会出现音节“不合时宜”,根据每个孩子的情况进行单独和自适应校准,以便通过按钮按下大约 79.4%的时间检测到它。对于每个孩子和每个组,评估 delta(刺激传递率)、theta(与语音相关)和 alpha(控制)频段的相位一致性。两个组在 delta 和 theta 频段都显示出显著的相位一致性,表明神经同步,但 alpha 频段没有。然而,与对照组儿童相比,阅读障碍儿童在 delta 频段仅表现出不同的优势相位和显著降低的相位一致性。对组优势相位的刺激前和刺激后角速度的分析表明,阅读障碍组仅在 delta 频段表现出异常反应。阅读障碍组 delta 频段的刺激前角速度(-130 毫秒至 0 毫秒)似乎明显快于对照组。因此,可以得出结论,对简单基于节拍的刺激的神经反应可能为发展性阅读障碍提供一种独特的神经标志物。这种神经反应的自动性质可能为诊断提供新的工具,并为矫正开辟新的途径。