• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与医疗保健规划和评估:呼吁社会公正。

Patient engagement in healthcare planning and evaluation: A call for social justice.

机构信息

Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), Vancouver, B.C, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Dec;37 Suppl 1:20-31. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3509. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.3509
PMID:35643909
Abstract

Patient engagement in healthcare planning and evaluation has been promoted as a way to improve healthcare's ability to meet patients' needs. However, populations experiencing oppression and discrimination, such as racism, colonialism, sexism, heterosexism, cisnormativity, ableism, classism, and poverty, are often underrepresented in patient engagement spaces. The context and structure of patient engagement processes may systematically exclude certain populations from participating in meaningful ways or from participating at all. By excluding certain populations from active, meaningful patient engagement, we risk planning and evaluating health services on the basis of the values, needs, and preferences of the dominant population. This, in turn, will further entrench health inequities and preclude the ability to surface ideas that challenge dominant conceptualisations of health and healthcare, thereby reinforcing the status quo rather than promoting healthcare transformation. Recognising that experiences of health, healthcare, and patient engagement processes are mediated through gender, race, ability, sexual orientation, and other dimensions of diversity, it is proposed that processes for engaging patients in healthcare planning and evaluation must by intersectional, attend to systemic and power relations, and truly put patients in the driver's seat of engagement processes. Health services planners and evaluators need to create more inclusive, accessible, and appropriate patient engagement experiences in order to focus on transforming healthcare towards a more socially just system.

摘要

患者参与医疗保健规划和评估已被提倡为改善医疗保健满足患者需求的能力的一种方式。然而,那些经历压迫和歧视的人群,如种族主义、殖民主义、性别歧视、异性恋主义、常态主义、残疾歧视、阶级歧视和贫困,往往在患者参与空间中代表性不足。患者参与过程的背景和结构可能会以系统的方式将某些人群排除在有意义的参与之外,或者完全排除他们的参与。通过将某些人群排除在积极、有意义的患者参与之外,我们有可能会根据主流人群的价值观、需求和偏好来规划和评估卫生服务。这反过来又会进一步加剧健康不平等,并排除提出挑战主导健康和医疗保健观念的想法的能力,从而强化现状,而不是促进医疗保健转型。认识到健康、医疗保健和患者参与过程的体验是通过性别、种族、能力、性取向和多样性的其他方面来调节的,有人提议,必须通过交叉性、关注系统性和权力关系、并真正让患者成为参与过程的主导者,来参与医疗保健规划和评估的患者。卫生服务规划者和评估者需要创造更具包容性、可及性和适当性的患者参与体验,以专注于将医疗保健转向更具社会公正的系统。

相似文献

1
Patient engagement in healthcare planning and evaluation: A call for social justice.患者参与医疗保健规划和评估:呼吁社会公正。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Dec;37 Suppl 1:20-31. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3509. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis.迈向更具包容性的患者和公众参与健康研究范式:纳入创伤知情的交叉性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2463-1.
3
Heard and valued: the development of a model to meaningfully engage marginalized populations in health services planning.被倾听与重视:构建一个让边缘化人群切实参与健康服务规划的模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 15;18(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2969-1.
4
The Concept of Oppression and Occupational Therapy: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.压迫概念与作业治疗:批判性综合解读。
Can J Occup Ther. 2021 Dec;88(4):407-417. doi: 10.1177/00084174211051168. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Using the Power Wheel as a transformative tool to promote equity through spaces and places of patient engagement.利用动力轮椅作为变革工具,通过患者参与的空间和场所促进公平。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 21;14(3):e074277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074277.
6
Towards the decolonisation of disability: A systematic review of disability conceptualisations, practices and experiences of First Nations people of Australia.迈向残疾去殖民化:对澳大利亚第一民族的残疾概念化、实践和经验的系统回顾。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115047. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115047. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Sensitive Topics, Missing Data, and Refusal in Social Network Studies: An Ethical Examination.社交网络研究中的敏感话题、缺失数据和拒绝:伦理审视。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):327-335. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12195. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
History at the table: conflict in planning in a community in the rural American South.餐桌上的历史:美国南部农村一个社区规划中的冲突
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Jun;37(3-4):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9051-6.
9
Making science and doing justice: The need to reframe research on racial inequities in oral health.实现科学与正义:重新构建口腔健康领域种族不平等研究的必要性。
Community Dent Health. 2021 May 28;38(2):132-137. doi: 10.1922/CDH_IADRBastos06.
10
Pandora's box is already open: answering the ongoing call to dismantle institutional oppression in the field of breastfeeding.潘多拉的盒子已经打开:回应在母乳喂养领域消除制度性压迫的持续呼声。
J Hum Lact. 2015 Feb;31(1):32-5. doi: 10.1177/0890334414554261. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
End-of-Life Cancer Care Interventions for Racially and Ethnically Diverse Populations in the USA: A Scoping Review.美国针对不同种族和族裔人群的临终癌症护理干预措施:一项范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;17(13):2209. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132209.
2
Addressing power imbalance in research: exploring power in integrated knowledge translation health research.解决研究中的权力不平衡问题:探索综合知识转化健康研究中的权力
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 23;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00706-2.
3
Amplifying adolescent and emerging adult voices: Development of a pediatric-to-adult transition research advisory council.
扩大青少年和刚成年者的声音:儿科至成人过渡研究咨询委员会的发展
Health Care Transit. 2024 Mar 27;2:100058. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100058. eCollection 2024.
4
Interrogating the effectiveness of service engagement for underserved populations in complex health and social care systems: towards an equitable engagement strategy.探究复杂的健康和社会保健系统中服务介入对服务不足人群的有效性:制定公平的介入策略。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 3;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02272-7.
5
Vascular medicine in the 21 century: Embracing comprehensive vasculature evaluation and multidisciplinary treatment.21世纪的血管医学:采用全面的血管系统评估和多学科治疗。
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Sep 26;12(27):6032-6044. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i27.6032.
6
Patient, family and caregiver engagement in diabetes care: a scoping review protocol.患者、家属和照护者在糖尿病照护中的参与:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e086772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086772.
7
Engaging diverse patients in a diverse world: the development and preliminary evaluation of educational modules to support diversity in patient engagement research.在多元世界中吸引不同患者参与:支持患者参与研究多元化的教育模块的开发与初步评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 7;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00455-0.