Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Center, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Card Fail. 2022 Sep;28(9):1445-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 27.
There is a paucity of data regarding sex differences in the profiles and outcomes of ambulatory patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support who present to the emergency department (ED).
We performed a retrospective analysis of 57,200 LVAD-related ED patient encounters from the 2010 to 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes identified patients aged 18 years or older with LVADs and associated primary and comorbidity diagnoses. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were stratified by sex and compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of hospital admission and death. Female patient encounters comprised 27.2% of ED visits and occurred at younger ages and more frequently with obesity and depression (all P < .01). There were no sex differences in presentation for device complication, stroke, infection, or heart failure (all P > .05); however, female patient encounters were more often respiratory- and genitourinary or gynecological related (both P < .01). After adjustment for age group, diabetes, depression, and hypertension, male patient encounters had a 38% increased odds of hospital admission (95% confidence interval 1.20-1.58), but there was no sex difference in the adjusted odds of death (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.45).
Patient encounters of females on LVAD support have significantly different comorbidities and outcomes compared with males. Further inquiry into these sex differences is imperative to improve long-term outcomes.
在因左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持而到急诊就诊的门诊患者中,关于性别差异在其特征和结局方面的数据很少。
我们对 2010 年至 2018 年全国急诊样本中的 57200 例 LVAD 相关急诊患者就诊进行了回顾性分析。国际疾病分类临床修订版第九版和第十版代码确定了年龄在 18 岁或以上、患有 LVAD 及其相关主要和合并症诊断的患者。按性别分层比较了临床特征和结局。多变量逻辑回归用于评估住院和死亡的预测因素。女性患者就诊占急诊就诊的 27.2%,年龄较小,更常伴有肥胖和抑郁(均 P <.01)。在出现设备并发症、中风、感染或心力衰竭方面,性别间无差异(均 P >.05);然而,女性患者就诊更常与呼吸系统和生殖泌尿系统或妇科相关(均 P <.01)。在调整年龄组、糖尿病、抑郁和高血压后,男性患者就诊的住院几率增加了 38%(95%置信区间 1.20-1.58),但调整后的死亡几率无性别差异(比值比 1.11,95%置信区间 0.86-1.45)。
与男性相比,接受 LVAD 支持的女性患者的合并症和结局有显著差异。进一步研究这些性别差异对于改善长期结局至关重要。