Suppr超能文献

精微喷丸对不锈钢和陶瓷托槽槽面摩擦性能的影响。

Effect of fine particle shot peening on surface friction of stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots.

机构信息

Residency Training Program in Orthodontics, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi.

出版信息

Dent Mater J. 2022 Oct 2;41(5):682-687. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-295. Epub 2022 May 27.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the static friction of untreated and fine particle shot peening (FPSP) treated stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots. A total of 60 pieces of stainless steel and 60 pieces of ceramic brackets (Roth prescription, 0.022×0.028 in) were divided into 3 groups: control (n=20), silica glass bead particle surface treatment (n=20) and stainless steel (SUS316L) particle surface treatment (n=20). Ten brackets of each group were combined with 0.019×0.025 in orthodontic stainless steel arch wires and were analyzed for static friction. The remaining 10 brackets of each group were tested for slot surface roughness and hardness. The result shows that stainless steel brackets treated with FPSP exhibited lower static friction, with smoother and harder surfaces than the control group (p<0.05). In contrast, treated ceramic brackets showed no difference from the control group in terms of static friction, roughness, and hardness (p>0.05).

摘要

本研究旨在比较未经处理和微粉高速粒子喷丸处理(fine particle shot peening,FPSP)后的不锈钢和陶瓷托槽槽沟的静摩擦系数。共制备 60 个不锈钢和 60 个陶瓷托槽(Roth 规格,0.022×0.028 in),分为 3 组:对照组(n=20)、玻璃珠粒子表面处理组(n=20)和不锈钢(SUS316L)粒子表面处理组(n=20)。每组中的 10 个托槽与 0.019×0.025 in 的正畸不锈钢方丝结合,用于分析静摩擦。每组剩余的 10 个托槽用于测试槽沟表面粗糙度和硬度。结果表明,与对照组相比,经 FPSP 处理的不锈钢托槽表现出较低的静摩擦系数,表面更光滑、更硬(p<0.05)。相比之下,经处理的陶瓷托槽在静摩擦系数、粗糙度和硬度方面与对照组无差异(p>0.05)。

相似文献

1
Effect of fine particle shot peening on surface friction of stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots.
Dent Mater J. 2022 Oct 2;41(5):682-687. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-295. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00501-8.
4
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.005.
5
Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Sep;116(3):336-45. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70247-7.
7
Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):177-83. doi: 10.2319/030313-179.1. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015.
10
Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0063:FRUTLW>2.0.CO;2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验