Suppr超能文献

利多卡因输注在慢性疼痛管理中的应用:一项前瞻性病例系列分析。

Lidocaine infusions in chronic pain management: A prospective case series analysis.

作者信息

Vacher Elizabeth, Kosela Monika, Song-Smith Charlie, Morell-Ducos Fausto, Fayaz Alan

机构信息

Medical Students, University College London.

Anaesthesia and Pain Consultant, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust.

出版信息

Br J Pain. 2022 Jun;16(3):270-280. doi: 10.1177/20494637211054198. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

Abstract

Chronic pain conditions are prevalent and cause a significant burden of disease. Intravenous lidocaine infusions have been reported to have an analgesic effect in patients with chronic neuropathic pain, but there is limited data supporting the efficacy of lidocaine across other chronic pain phenotypes. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a single infusion of intravenous lidocaine for pain relief and the impact on quality of life. We evaluated data from 74 patients with chronic pain who were treated with intravenous lidocaine at a specialist pain centre. Participants completed a questionnaire consisting of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form and additional EQ-5D quality of life metrics, before treatment and at follow-up. Data comparing pain severity did not demonstrate a statistically significant change after treatment when averaged across the entire patient cohort (6.15-5.88, = .106), irrespective of gender or pain phenotype. Scores for pain interference showed statistically significant reductions following treatment (7.05-6.41, = .023), which may have been driven through improvements in sleep (7.41-6.35, = .001); however, these reductions are not clinically significant. The patient cohort was stratified into responders and non-responders based on >30% improvement in response to an overall impression of pain reduction question following treatment. In the 'responder' cohort, pain intensity scores showed a statistically significant reduction post-infusion (6.18-5.49, = .0135), but no change was apparent for non-responders (6.07-6.09, = .920). There were no differences between responders and non-responders for pain sub-types in our study. This study found no difference in pain outcomes in a cohort of patients with chronic pain, a mean of 63 days following a single lidocaine infusion. However, a specific subgroup of responders may show slight improvements in some pain outcomes that may warrant further exploration.

摘要

慢性疼痛状况普遍存在,会造成重大疾病负担。据报道,静脉输注利多卡因对慢性神经性疼痛患者有镇痛作用,但支持利多卡因对其他慢性疼痛表型疗效的数据有限。我们的研究旨在评估单次静脉输注利多卡因缓解疼痛的疗效及其对生活质量的影响。我们评估了在一家专科疼痛中心接受静脉利多卡因治疗的74例慢性疼痛患者的数据。参与者在治疗前和随访时完成了一份问卷,问卷包括简明疼痛量表(BPI)简表和额外的EQ-5D生活质量指标。对整个患者队列平均而言,比较疼痛严重程度的数据在治疗后未显示出统计学上的显著变化(6.15 - 5.88,P = 0.106),无论性别或疼痛表型如何。疼痛干扰评分在治疗后显示出统计学上的显著降低(7.05 - 6.41,P = 0.023),这可能是由于睡眠改善(7.41 - 6.35,P = 0.001)所致;然而,这些降低在临床上并不显著。根据治疗后对疼痛减轻总体印象问题的回答改善>30%,将患者队列分为反应者和无反应者。在“反应者”队列中,输注后疼痛强度评分显示出统计学上的显著降低(6.18 - 5.49,P = 0.0135),但无反应者无明显变化(6.07 - 6.09,P = 0.920)。在我们的研究中,反应者和无反应者在疼痛亚型方面没有差异。本研究发现,在一组慢性疼痛患者中,单次输注利多卡因平均63天后,疼痛结局没有差异。然而,一个特定的反应者亚组可能在某些疼痛结局方面有轻微改善,这可能值得进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ef/9136989/5ac03e2c3dc5/10.1177_20494637211054198-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验