• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两个数据库以确定阿片类药物使用障碍的丁丙诺啡治疗的可及性。

Comparing Two Databases to Identify Access to Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

出版信息

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2022 Jun;36(2):103-111. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2022.2070691. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1080/15360288.2022.2070691
PMID:35648731
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the differences in buprenorphine prescribers from a county level in the state of Texas by comparing the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Buprenorphine Practitioner Locator to the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) Controlled Substance Act (CSA) database.

METHODS

County-level counts of buprenorphine prescribers were calculated from both the publicly available SAMHSA buprenorphine practitioner locator list and the DEA CSA database. These were then used to estimate the number of providers per 100,000 residents in each county. Regional variation in access to buprenorphine was compared descriptively across the state using poverty data from the US Census and county-level demography from the Texas Demographic Center.

RESULTS

This study found 68.8% more X-waivered providers on the DEA CSA database (n = 2,622) with at least one provider reported in 125 of 144 counties in the state (49.2%) compared to the SAMHSA Buprenorphine Practitioner Locator (n = 1,553) with at least one provider reported in 103 counties (40.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a complete public registry of buprenorphine prescribers can inhibit the ability of patients to identify a convenient treatment. More work is needed to quantify the gap between treatment capacity and treatment need.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过比较物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局(SAMHSA)的丁丙诺啡从业者定位器与毒品执法局(DEA)的《受控物质法》(CSA)数据库,评估德克萨斯州县级丁丙诺啡处方者之间的差异。

方法

从 SAMHSA 公开的丁丙诺啡从业者定位器列表和 DEA CSA 数据库中计算了县级丁丙诺啡处方者的计数。然后,使用这些计数来估计每个县每 10 万居民中的提供者人数。使用美国人口普查的贫困数据和德克萨斯州人口中心的县级人口统计学数据,对全州范围内丁丙诺啡获取的区域差异进行了描述性比较。

结果

本研究发现,与 SAMHSA 丁丙诺啡从业者定位器(n=1553)相比,在州内 144 个县中的 103 个县(40.5%)至少有一名报告者相比,DEA CSA 数据库(n=2622)中有 X 豁免的提供者多 68.8%,至少有一名报告者的县有 125 个(49.2%)。

结论

缺乏完整的丁丙诺啡处方者公共登记册可能会阻碍患者识别便利的治疗方法。需要做更多的工作来量化治疗能力和治疗需求之间的差距。

相似文献

1
Comparing Two Databases to Identify Access to Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.比较两个数据库以确定阿片类药物使用障碍的丁丙诺啡治疗的可及性。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2022 Jun;36(2):103-111. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2022.2070691. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Geographic Distribution of Providers With a DEA Waiver to Prescribe Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A 5-Year Update.持 DEA 豁免权开具丁丙诺啡用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的提供者的地理分布:5 年更新。
J Rural Health. 2019 Jan;35(1):108-112. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12307. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
Tracking the geographic distribution and growth of clinicians with a DEA waiver to prescribe buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder.追踪具有 DEA 豁免权开具丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的临床医生的地理分布和增长情况。
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):87-92. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12569. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Broadband access and telemedicine adoption for opioid use disorder treatment in the United States.美国宽带接入和远程医疗在阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中的应用。
J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):233-239. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12699. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Comparison between buprenorphine provider availability and opioid deaths among US counties.美国各县的丁丙诺啡提供情况与阿片类药物死亡人数比较。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Oct;93:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
U.S. trends in the supply of providers with a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in 2016 and 2018.2016 年和 2018 年美国具有开具丁丙诺啡用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍处方豁免资质的提供者供应趋势。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107527. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.029. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
7
Opting into the Public List of DATA-Waivered Practitioners: Variations by Specialty, Treatment Capacity, and Practitioner Characteristics.选择加入数据豁免从业者公共名单:按专业、治疗能力和从业者特征的变化。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(3):e197-e202. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000911.
8
Where Is Buprenorphine Dispensed to Treat Opioid Use Disorders? The Role of Private Offices, Opioid Treatment Programs, and Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in Urban and Rural Counties.用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的丁丙诺啡在哪里配发?私人诊所、阿片类药物治疗项目以及城乡县的药物滥用治疗设施所起的作用。
Milbank Q. 2015 Sep;93(3):561-83. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12137.
9
Trends in buprenorphine-waivered providers in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states by their public listing status.按公开上市状态划分,医疗补助扩大州和非扩大州中获得丁丙诺啡豁免的提供者的趋势。
Subst Abus. 2022 Dec;43(1):1072-1074. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2060428.
10
Geographic access to buprenorphine prescribers for patients who use public transit.使用公共交通工具的患者获取丁丙诺啡处方医生的地理可达性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Oct;117:108093. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108093. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for jurisdictional vulnerability assessment of opioid-related outcomes.评估阿片类药物相关结局的管辖范围脆弱性的方法。
Prev Med. 2023 May;170:107490. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107490. Epub 2023 Mar 22.