Suppr超能文献

纤维肌痛调查问卷与活动性类风湿关节炎患者定量感觉测试的相关性。

Correlation of Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire and Quantitative Sensory Testing Among Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

机构信息

M.N. Moore, MD, MSc, Clinical Instructor, W. Marder, MD, Clinical Professor, Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan;

B.I. Wallace, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor, Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, and VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;49(9):1052-1057. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.220046. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly demonstrate disordered pain processing associated with high pain sensitization. Pain sensitization is often assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST), which is burdensome to patients. The self-administered Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ) has been proposed as a low-burden, surrogate measure of central pain sensitization. We examined the correlation between FSQ and QST in patients with active RA.

METHODS

Participants in the Central Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CPIRA) cohort underwent FSQ and QST evaluation at enrollment. QST measures included pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the thumb, trapezius, wrist, and knee; temporal summation (TS) at the wrist and arm; and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Partial Spearman correlation between FSQ and each QST measure was assessed, adjusted for demographic factors, study site, disease characteristics, and pain catastrophizing. Sensitivity analyses included (1) stratified analysis by sex and (2) evaluation of how each component of FSQ associates with the QST measures.

RESULTS

Among 285 participants with active RA, FSQ was weakly but statistically significantly correlated with PPT ( range = -0.31 to -0.21), and TS ( range = 0.13-0.15) at all sites in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment, statistically significant correlations persisted for TS at the wrist and PPT at all sites (except the thumb). Sensitivity analyses did not identify differences in association based on sex or with individual FSQ components.

CONCLUSION

FSQ and QST were correlated among participants with active RA, but the strength of association was weak. QST and FSQ are not interchangeable measures of pain sensitization.

摘要

目的

类风湿关节炎(RA)患者常表现出与高痛觉敏感相关的疼痛处理障碍。痛觉敏感通常使用定量感觉测试(QST)进行评估,但患者负担较重。自我管理的纤维肌痛调查问卷(FSQ)已被提议作为一种中枢痛觉敏感的低负担替代测量方法。我们研究了活跃性 RA 患者中 FSQ 与 QST 之间的相关性。

方法

CPIRA 队列的参与者在入组时接受了 FSQ 和 QST 评估。QST 测量包括拇指、斜方肌、腕部和膝部的压力疼痛阈值(PPT);腕部和手臂的时间总和(TS);以及条件性疼痛调节(CPM)。评估了 FSQ 与每项 QST 测量之间的部分 Spearman 相关性,调整了人口统计学因素、研究地点、疾病特征和疼痛灾难化。敏感性分析包括:(1)按性别进行分层分析;(2)评估 FSQ 的每个成分与 QST 测量的关联方式。

结果

在 285 名患有活动性 RA 的参与者中,FSQ 与 PPT(范围=-0.31 至-0.21)和未调整分析中所有部位的 TS(范围=0.13-0.15)呈弱但具有统计学意义的相关性。调整后,腕部 TS 和所有部位 PPT 的相关性仍具有统计学意义(拇指除外)。敏感性分析未发现基于性别的关联差异或 FSQ 单个成分的关联差异。

结论

在患有活动性 RA 的参与者中,FSQ 与 QST 相关,但关联强度较弱。QST 和 FSQ 不是疼痛敏感的可互换测量方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验