Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Dept of Internal Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022 Jun 1;8(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00525-7.
Qualitative Survey study.
One might assume that those with higher and more complete spinal cord injuries are at higher risk of depression and anxiety. The objective of this study was to assess the association between level and severity of injury with the degree of anxiety and depression in chronic spinal cord injury.
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation outpatient clinic.
49 subjects were recruited from our research database. Time from injury ranged from 6 months to 20+ years. Sample included 23 motor complete and 26 motor incomplete participants; of these 24 were people with paraplegia, 25 were people with tetraplegia. They answered HADS, BDI-FS and PHQ-9 questionnaires. Participants were grouped based on time post injury and then were further divided by motor complete (AIS A/B) and incomplete (AIS C/D) and level (tetraplegia cf. paraplegia). Two-sample t-tests were conducted to evaluate the differences in depression and anxiety scores, between individuals with different completeness and injury type.
There were no significant differences amongst the groups tested regarding severity of depression and anxiety, however, those with paraplegia or incomplete injuries had higher but not significantly higher average scores for depression and anxiety.
We found there were no statistically significant differences in depression and anxiety scores among the groups. These results suggest that all people with SCI may be at similar risk of depression and anxiety, regardless of SCI severity and level.
定性调查研究。
人们可能认为,脊髓损伤程度越高且越完全的人,患抑郁和焦虑的风险就越高。本研究的目的是评估损伤程度和损伤水平与慢性脊髓损伤患者焦虑和抑郁程度之间的相关性。
脊髓损伤康复门诊。
从我们的研究数据库中招募了 49 名受试者。从受伤到现在的时间从 6 个月到 20 年以上不等。样本包括 23 名运动完全损伤和 26 名运动不完全损伤的参与者;其中 24 人是截瘫患者,25 人是四肢瘫患者。他们回答了 HADS、BDI-FS 和 PHQ-9 问卷。参与者根据受伤后的时间分组,然后根据运动完全(AIS A/B)和不完全(AIS C/D)以及损伤水平(四肢瘫与截瘫)进一步分组。采用两样本 t 检验评估不同完整性和损伤类型的个体之间抑郁和焦虑评分的差异。
在测试的不同组之间,在抑郁和焦虑的严重程度方面没有显著差异,然而,截瘫或不完全损伤的患者的抑郁和焦虑的平均得分较高,但无统计学意义。
我们发现各组的抑郁和焦虑评分没有统计学上的显著差异。这些结果表明,所有脊髓损伤患者可能面临类似的抑郁和焦虑风险,而与脊髓损伤的严重程度和水平无关。