Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Oecologia. 2022 Jun;199(2):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05189-6. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
The expansion of human activity into natural habitats often results in the introduction of artificial light at night, which can disrupt local ecosystems. Recent advances in LED technology have enabled spectral tuning of artificial light sources, which could in theory limit their impact on vulnerable taxa. To date, however, experimental comparisons of ecologically friendly candidate colors have often considered only one type of behavioral impact, sometimes on only single species. Resulting recommendations cannot be broadly implemented if their consequences for other local taxa are unknown. Working at a popular firefly ecotourism site, we exposed the insect community to artificial illumination of three colors (blue, broad-spectrum amber, red) and measured flight-to-light behavior as well as the courtship flash behavior of male Photinus carolinus fireflies. Firefly courtship activity was greatest under blue and red lights, while the most flying insects were attracted to blue and broad-spectrum amber lights. Thus, while impacts of spectrally tuned artificial light varied across taxa, our results suggest that red light, rather than amber light, is least disruptive to insects overall, and therefore more generally insect friendly.
人类活动向自然栖息地的扩张通常会导致夜间人工照明的引入,这可能会扰乱当地的生态系统。最近 LED 技术的进步使得人工光源的光谱可以调谐,这在理论上可以限制它们对脆弱分类群的影响。然而,到目前为止,对生态友好型候选颜色的实验比较往往只考虑了一种行为影响,有时甚至只针对单一物种。如果不知道它们对其他当地分类群的后果,那么这些建议就不能广泛实施。在一个受欢迎的萤火虫生态旅游景点,我们用三种颜色(蓝色、宽谱琥珀色、红色)的人工照明来照射昆虫群落,并测量它们的趋光行为以及 Photinus carolinus 雄萤火虫的求偶闪光行为。萤火虫的求偶活动在蓝光和红光下最为活跃,而最多的飞行昆虫则被蓝光和宽谱琥珀光吸引。因此,虽然光谱调谐人工光的影响在不同的分类群中有所不同,但我们的结果表明,红光而不是琥珀光对昆虫的整体干扰最小,因此更普遍地对昆虫友好。