• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍患者对负性刺激的注意力分配与奖赏相关的神经通路有关。

Attention allocation to negatively-valenced stimuli in PTSD is associated with reward-related neural pathways.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, The Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(10):4666-4674. doi: 10.1017/S003329172200157X. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1017/S003329172200157X
PMID:35652602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9715854/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a recent eye-tracking study we found a differential dwell time pattern for negatively-valenced and neutral faces among patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trauma-exposed healthy control (TEHCs), and healthy control (HC) participants. Here, we explored whether these group differences relate to resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) patterns of brain areas previously linked to both attention processes and PTSD. These encompass the amygdala, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC), and nucleus accumbens (NAcc).

METHODS

Ten minutes magnetic resonance imaging rsFC scans were recorded in 17 PTSD patients, 21 TEHCs, and 16 HCs. Participants then completed a free-viewing eye-tracking task assessing attention allocation outside the scanner. Dwell time on negatively-valenced stimuli (DT%) were assessed relative to functional connectivity in the aforementioned seed regions of interest (amygdala, dACC, dlPFC, vlPFC, and NAcc) to whole-brain voxel-wise rsFC.

RESULTS

As previously reported, group differences occurred in attention allocation to negative-valence stimuli, with longer dwell time on negatively valence stimuli in the PTSD and TEHC groups than the HC group. Higher DT% correlated with weaker NAcc-orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) connectivity in patients with PTSD. Conversely, a positive association emerged in the HC group between DT% and NAcc-OFC connectivity.

CONCLUSIONS

While exploratory in nature, present findings may suggest that reward-related brain areas are involved in disengaging attention from negative-valenced stimuli, and possibly in regulating ensuing negative emotions.

摘要

背景

在最近的一项眼动追踪研究中,我们发现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者、创伤暴露健康对照组(TEHC)和健康对照组(HC)的负性和中性面孔的注视时间存在差异。在这里,我们探讨了这些组间差异是否与先前与注意力过程和 PTSD 均相关的大脑区域的静息态功能连接(rsFC)模式有关。这些区域包括杏仁核、背侧前扣带皮层(dACC)、背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)、腹外侧前额叶皮层(vlPFC)和伏隔核(NAcc)。

方法

17 名 PTSD 患者、21 名 TEHC 和 16 名 HC 完成了 10 分钟的磁共振成像 rsFC 扫描。然后,参与者在扫描室外完成了一项自由观看眼动追踪任务,评估注意力分配。相对于上述种子感兴趣区(杏仁核、dACC、dlPFC、vlPFC 和 NAcc)的功能连接,评估负性刺激的注视时间(DT%)。对全脑体素进行 rsFC。

结果

如前所述,在对负性效价刺激的注意力分配方面存在组间差异,PTSD 和 TEHC 组的注视时间长于 HC 组。较高的 DT%与 PTSD 患者的 NAcc-眶额皮层(OFC)连接较弱相关。相反,在 HC 组中,DT%与 NAcc-OFC 连接之间存在正相关。

结论

虽然本研究为探索性研究,但目前的研究结果可能表明,与奖励相关的大脑区域参与了从负性效价刺激中转移注意力,并可能参与了调节随后的负面情绪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/74c2f37fb2dd/S003329172200157X_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/cb25fa40c2e6/S003329172200157X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/6609cdd2517d/S003329172200157X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/74c2f37fb2dd/S003329172200157X_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/cb25fa40c2e6/S003329172200157X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/6609cdd2517d/S003329172200157X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10388320/74c2f37fb2dd/S003329172200157X_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Attention allocation to negatively-valenced stimuli in PTSD is associated with reward-related neural pathways.创伤后应激障碍患者对负性刺激的注意力分配与奖赏相关的神经通路有关。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(10):4666-4674. doi: 10.1017/S003329172200157X. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD.眼动追踪指标中的注意力分配和注意力偏差可变性与创伤暴露和 PTSD 有不同的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 May;96:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Altered resting state functional connectivity of fear and reward circuitry in comorbid PTSD and major depression.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与重度抑郁症共病时恐惧和奖赏回路静息态功能连接的改变
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jul;34(7):641-650. doi: 10.1002/da.22594. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Anhedonia in Trauma-Exposed Individuals: Functional Connectivity and Decision-Making Correlates.创伤暴露个体的快感缺失:功能连接和决策相关的关联。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Nov;3(11):959-967. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
Exposure-based therapy changes amygdala and hippocampus resting-state functional connectivity in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder.暴露疗法改变创伤后应激障碍患者杏仁核和海马体静息状态功能连接。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Oct;35(10):974-984. doi: 10.1002/da.22816. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
PTSD symptom severity is associated with increased recruitment of top-down attentional control in a trauma-exposed sample.在遭受创伤的样本中,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的严重程度与自上而下注意力控制的增强有关。
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Nov 18;7:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.012. eCollection 2015.
7
Attention allocation in posttraumatic stress disorder: an eye-tracking study.创伤后应激障碍中的注意力分配:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Med. 2021 Feb 26:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000581.
8
Comparing resting-state connectivity of working memory networks in U.S. Service members with mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder.比较美国现役军人中患有轻度创伤性脑损伤和创伤后应激障碍者的工作记忆网络静息态连接。
Brain Res. 2022 Dec 1;1796:148099. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148099. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
9
Regional Prefrontal Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.创伤后应激障碍的区域性前额叶静息态功能连接。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Apr;4(4):390-398. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
10
Neural Responsivity to Reward Versus Punishment Shortly After Trauma Predicts Long-Term Development of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms.创伤后不久对奖励和惩罚的神经反应性预测创伤后应激症状的长期发展。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Feb;7(2):150-161. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Trauma Change the Way Individuals with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Deal with Positive Stimuli?创伤会改变创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者应对积极刺激的方式吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;14(12):1195. doi: 10.3390/bs14121195.
2
Increased attention allocation to stimuli reflecting end-states of compulsive behaviors among obsessive compulsive individuals.强迫观念个体对反映强迫行为终点状态的刺激分配更多的注意力。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39459-x.
3
Structural equation modeling of treatment-related changes in neural connectivity for youth with PTSD.
创伤后应激障碍青少年治疗相关神经连接变化的结构方程模型。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Aug 1;334:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.066. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
4
Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD.眼动追踪指标中的注意力分配和注意力偏差可变性与创伤暴露和 PTSD 有不同的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 May;96:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.