• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD.眼动追踪指标中的注意力分配和注意力偏差可变性与创伤暴露和 PTSD 有不同的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 May;96:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Attention allocation in posttraumatic stress disorder: an eye-tracking study.创伤后应激障碍中的注意力分配:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Med. 2021 Feb 26:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000581.
3
Attention allocation to negatively-valenced stimuli in PTSD is associated with reward-related neural pathways.创伤后应激障碍患者对负性刺激的注意力分配与奖赏相关的神经通路有关。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(10):4666-4674. doi: 10.1017/S003329172200157X. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Attention bias towards threat in African American children exposed to early life trauma.早期生活创伤暴露的非裔美国儿童对威胁的注意偏向。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Apr 6;383:112513. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112513. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
5
Attentional bias toward negative stimuli in PTSD: an eye-tracking study.创伤后应激障碍中对负面刺激的注意偏向:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;53(12):5809-5817. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003063. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Attention bias variability and posttraumatic stress symptoms: the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties.注意偏向变异性与创伤后应激症状:情绪调节困难的中介作用。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1300-1307. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1743235. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
Attention bias toward threatening faces in women with PTSD: eye tracking correlates by symptom cluster.创伤后应激障碍女性对威胁性面孔的注意偏向:按症状群划分的眼动追踪相关性
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Feb 13;10(1):1568133. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1568133. eCollection 2019.
8
Attentional bias in German Armed Forces veterans with and without posttraumatic stress symptoms - An eye-tracking investigation and group comparison.创伤后应激症状的德国武装部队退伍军人和无创伤后应激症状的德国武装部队退伍军人的注意力偏差:一项眼动追踪研究和组间比较。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;76:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101726. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
The BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism Moderates the Relationship Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Trauma Script-evoked Attentional Bias to Cocaine Cues Among Patients with Cocaine Dependence.脑源性神经营养因子 Val66Met 多态性调节创伤后应激障碍与可卡因依赖患者创伤脚本诱发对可卡因线索注意偏向之间的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 May;72:102223. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102223. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
The role of negative affect in the association between attention bias to threat and posttraumatic stress: An eye-tracking study.负性情绪在注意偏向于威胁与创伤后应激之间的关系中的作用:一项眼动研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112674. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112674. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Choosing certainty over risk: Associations of PTSD symptom severity with memory sampling during experiential decision making.选择确定性而非风险:创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度与体验性决策过程中记忆抽样的关联。
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Mar;110:102979. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102979. Epub 2025 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Is attentional bias variability causally implicated in emotional vulnerability? A systematic review and meta-analysis.注意偏向变异性是否与情绪易感性存在因果关联?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Mar;146:105069. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105069. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks.注意偏向变异性的有效性存疑:来自两项概念上不相关认知任务的证据。
J Affect Disord Rep. 2022 Dec;10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100411. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
Attention allocation in OCD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking-based research.强迫症中的注意力分配:基于眼动追踪研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.141. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Attentional bias variability and its association with psychological and health symptoms: A meta-analysis.注意偏向变异性及其与心理和健康症状的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Sep;140:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104812. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
5
Attention allocation to negatively-valenced stimuli in PTSD is associated with reward-related neural pathways.创伤后应激障碍患者对负性刺激的注意力分配与奖赏相关的神经通路有关。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(10):4666-4674. doi: 10.1017/S003329172200157X. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Attentional bias in German Armed Forces veterans with and without posttraumatic stress symptoms - An eye-tracking investigation and group comparison.创伤后应激症状的德国武装部队退伍军人和无创伤后应激症状的德国武装部队退伍军人的注意力偏差:一项眼动追踪研究和组间比较。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;76:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101726. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
Fixation classification: how to merge and select fixation candidates.注视分类:如何合并与选择注视候选对象。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2765-2776. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01723-1. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Attention allocation in posttraumatic stress disorder: an eye-tracking study.创伤后应激障碍中的注意力分配:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Med. 2021 Feb 26:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000581.
9
Aberrant attentional bias to sad faces in depression and the role of stressful life events: Evidence from an eye-tracking paradigm.抑郁症患者对悲伤面孔的异常注意偏向及应激性生活事件的作用:来自眼动追踪范式的证据。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Dec;135:103762. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103762. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
10
What is attention bias variability? Examining the potential roles of attention control and response time variability in its relationship with anxiety.什么是注意偏向变异性?考察注意控制和反应时间变异性在其与焦虑关系中的潜在作用。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Dec;135:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103751. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

眼动追踪指标中的注意力分配和注意力偏差可变性与创伤暴露和 PTSD 有不同的关系。

Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2023 May;96:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715
PMID:37120959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583221/
Abstract

Amplified attention allocation to negative information in one's environment has been implicated in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Attention bias variability (ABV), the magnitude of attention fluctuation between negative and neutral cues, has also been found to be elevated in PTSD. While eye-tracking methodology has been used in research on attention allocation in PTSD, ABV was only explored using manual reaction-time-based indices. Thirty-seven participants with PTSD, 34 trauma-exposed healthy controls (TEHC), and 30 non-exposed healthy controls (HC) completed an eye-tracking free-viewing task in which matrices comprised of neutral and negatively-valenced faces were presented. Threat-related attention allocation was calculated as the proportion of dwell time (DT%) on negatively-valenced faces. Eye-tracking-based ABV was calculated as the standard deviation of DT% across matrices. DT% on negatively-valenced faces was greater in participants with PTSD compared to both TEHC (p = .036, d = 0.50) and HC (p < .001, d = 1.03), with TEHCs showing a greater attentional bias compared to HCs (p = .001, d = 0.84). Controlling for average fixation duration, ABV was higher in both the PTSD and TEHC groups relative to the HC group (p = .004, d = 0.40), with no difference between the two trauma-exposed groups. Biased attention allocation toward negative social information is related to PTSD pathology, whereas elevated ABV measured with eye-tracking appear to be related to trauma-exposure per-se.

摘要

对环境中负面信息的注意力分配增强与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)有关。注意力波动变异性(ABV),即对负性和中性线索之间注意力波动的幅度,在 PTSD 中也被发现升高。虽然眼动追踪方法已被用于研究 PTSD 中的注意力分配,但 ABV 仅使用手动反应时为基础的指标进行了探索。37 名 PTSD 患者、34 名创伤暴露的健康对照组(TEHC)和 30 名未暴露的健康对照组(HC)完成了一项眼动追踪自由观看任务,其中呈现了由中性和负性面孔组成的矩阵。威胁相关的注意力分配被计算为负性面孔的注视时间比例(DT%)。眼动追踪的 ABV 被计算为矩阵间 DT%的标准差。与 TEHC(p=.036,d=0.50)和 HC(p<.001,d=1.03)相比,PTSD 患者对负性面孔的 DT%更大,TEHC 对负性面孔的注意力偏向大于 HC(p=.001,d=0.84)。控制平均注视持续时间后,PTSD 和 TEHC 组的 ABV 均高于 HC 组(p=.004,d=0.40),两组创伤暴露者之间无差异。对负性社会信息的偏向注意力分配与 PTSD 病理有关,而眼动追踪测量的 ABV 升高似乎与创伤暴露本身有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb3f/10583221/3e73d85add32/nihms-1935921-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb3f/10583221/2fe4fcb7f49e/nihms-1935921-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb3f/10583221/3e73d85add32/nihms-1935921-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb3f/10583221/2fe4fcb7f49e/nihms-1935921-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb3f/10583221/3e73d85add32/nihms-1935921-f0002.jpg