Suppr超能文献

抗SSA/Ro抗体阳性孕妇胎儿房室间期的测量

Measurement of fetal atrioventricular intervals in pregnant women with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies.

作者信息

Matsubara Yayoi, Fujita Daisuke, Inamura Noboru, Fujita Tomio

机构信息

Fujita Clinic, Shimanouchi Building 2F, 2-11-20 Shimanouchi, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 542-0082, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakucho, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Jul;49(3):451-461. doi: 10.1007/s10396-022-01226-2. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of our study was to compare and consider reference values of fetal atrioventricular (AV) intervals as measured by four different pulsed Doppler wave techniques (left ventricular inflow/outflow [LV in/out], pulmonary vein/pulmonary artery [PV/PA], innominate vein/ascending aorta [InnV/AA], and supra vena cava/ascending aorta [SVC/AA]) in pregnant women with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies.

METHODS

Between March 2014 and September 2020, 52 pregnant women with anti-SSA antibodies were enrolled. No bradyarrhythmia was observed in the group. A pulsed Doppler examination of the fetal heart was performed to obtain measurements of the mechanical Doppler AV interval. Doppler measurements were performed using four methods: LV in/out, PV/PA, InnV/AA, and SVC/AA. A statistical analysis was performed to examine the mean, standard deviation, significant difference, and correlation of the four methods. The detection rate of each method was also calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the AV intervals between any of the four methods. There was also a positive correlation in the AV intervals of each of the four methods. The fetal heart rate and AV interval showed no correlation. The gestational age and AV interval also showed no correlation. The detection rate was highest for LV in/out (62.6%, 95% confidence interval: 56.5-68.4).

CONCLUSION

All four pulsed Doppler methods are useful for measuring AV intervals. The most practical method is LV in/out.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是比较和考量四种不同脉冲多普勒波技术(左心室流入/流出[LV in/out]、肺静脉/肺动脉[PV/PA]、无名静脉/升主动脉[InnV/AA]和上腔静脉/升主动脉[SVC/AA])测量的胎儿房室(AV)间期的参考值,研究对象为抗SSA/Ro抗体阳性的孕妇。

方法

2014年3月至2020年9月,纳入52例抗SSA抗体阳性的孕妇。该组未观察到缓慢性心律失常。对胎儿心脏进行脉冲多普勒检查以获取机械性多普勒房室间期的测量值。采用四种方法进行多普勒测量:LV in/out、PV/PA、InnV/AA和SVC/AA。进行统计分析以检验这四种方法的均值、标准差、显著差异和相关性。还计算了每种方法的检测率。

结果

四种方法中任何一种方法测量的房室间期均无显著差异。四种方法各自测量的房室间期也呈正相关。胎儿心率与房室间期无相关性。孕周与房室间期也无相关性。LV in/out的检测率最高(62.6%,95%置信区间:56.5 - 68.4)。

结论

所有四种脉冲多普勒方法均有助于测量房室间期。最实用的方法是LV in/out。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验