Suppr超能文献

一项关于评估单病例随机对照试验对临床结局影响的范围综述。

A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States of America.

Houston Academy of Medicine, The Texas Medical Center Library, Houston, TX, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 2;17(6):e0269387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269387. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical decisions informed by n-of-1 trials improve patient outcomes compared to usual care. Our objective was to provide an overview of the clinical trial evidence on the effect of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search of medical databases, trial registries, and gray literature was performed to identify trials assessing clinical outcomes in a group of patients undergoing an n-of-1 trial compared to those receiving usual care for any clinical condition. We abstracted elements related to study design and results and assessed risk of bias for both the overall randomized trials and the n-of-1 trials. The review was registered on PROSPERO. (CRD: 42020166490).

FINDINGS

Twelve randomized trials of the n-of-1 approach were identified in conditions spanning chronic pain, osteoarthritis, chronic irreversible airflow limitation, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, statin intolerance, and hypertension. One trial showed a statistically significant benefit in the primary outcome. Only one reached the pre-specified sample size target. Secondary outcomes showed modest benefits, including decreasing medication use, fewer atrial fibrillation episodes, and improved patient satisfaction.

INTERPRETATION

Very few trials have been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of n-of-1 trials in improving clinical outcomes, and most trials were underpowered for the primary outcome. Barriers to enrollment and retention in these trials should be explored, as well-powered randomized trials are needed to clarify the clinical impact of n-of-1 trials and assess their utility in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

单病例(n-of-1)试验可用于解决个体患者的治疗不确定性。治疗方案被系统地相互对照测试,生成用于为个体化治疗计划提供信息的患者特异性数据。我们假设,基于 n-of-1 试验的临床决策可改善患者结局,优于常规护理。我们的目的是提供关于 n-of-1 试验对临床结局影响的临床试验证据概述。

方法

系统检索医学数据库、试验注册处和灰色文献,以确定评估一组接受 n-of-1 试验的患者与接受任何临床状况常规护理的患者的临床结局的试验。我们提取了与研究设计和结果相关的要素,并评估了整体随机试验和 n-of-1 试验的偏倚风险。该综述在 PROSPERO 上进行了注册(CRD:42020166490)。

结果

共确定了 12 项 n-of-1 方法的随机试验,涉及的疾病包括慢性疼痛、骨关节炎、慢性不可逆气流受限、注意缺陷多动障碍、血脂异常、心房颤动、他汀类药物不耐受和高血压。一项试验显示主要结局有统计学显著获益。只有一项试验达到了预先指定的样本量目标。次要结局显示出适度的获益,包括减少药物使用、减少心房颤动发作和提高患者满意度。

解释

评估 n-of-1 试验改善临床结局有效性的试验很少,大多数试验的主要结局均未达到预期的样本量。应探讨这些试验中入组和保留的障碍,需要进行更大规模的随机试验以阐明 n-of-1 试验的临床影响,并评估其在临床实践中的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801c/9162303/9c4b7c8be25f/pone.0269387.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验