Cameron Sharon, Boyle Christian, Dillon Harvey
Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Division of Human Communication, Development and Hearing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Int J Audiol. 2023 Aug;62(8):756-766. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2078432. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Create a language-independent, ecologically valid auditory processing assessment and evaluate relative stimuli intelligibility in native and non-native English speakers.
The Language-Independent Speech in Noise and Reverberation Test (LISiNaR) targets comprised consonant-vowel (CVCV) pseudo-words. Distractors comprised CVCVCVCV pseudo-words. Stimuli were presented over headphones using an iPad either face-to-face or remotely. Scoring occurred adaptively to establish a participant's speech reception threshold in noise (SRT). The listening environment was simulated using reverberant and anechoic head-related transfer functions. In four test conditions, targets originated from 0°. Distractors originated from either ±90°, ±67.5° and ±45° (spatially separated) or 0° azimuth (co-located). Reverberation impact (RI) was calculated as the difference in SRTs between the anechoic and reverberant conditions and spatial advantage (SA) as the difference between the spatially separated and co-located conditions.
Young adult native speakers of Australian ( = 24) and Canadian (25) and non-native English speakers (34).
No significant effects of language occurred for the test conditions, RI or SA. A small but significant effect of delivery mode occurred for RI. Reverberation impacted SRT by 5 dB relative to anechoic conditions.
Performance on LISiNaR is not affected by the native language or accent of groups tested in this study.
创建一种与语言无关、具有生态效度的听觉处理评估方法,并评估以英语为母语者和非英语母语者对相关刺激的可懂度。
“与语言无关的噪声和混响中的语音测试”(LISiNaR)的目标刺激由辅音-元音(CVCV)假词组成。干扰刺激由CVCVCVCV假词组成。刺激通过iPad使用头戴式耳机面对面或远程呈现。评分采用自适应方式以确定参与者在噪声中的言语接受阈值(SRT)。使用混响和消声头部相关传递函数模拟聆听环境。在四种测试条件下,目标刺激来自0°。干扰刺激来自±90°、±67.5°和±45°(空间分离)或0°方位角(共定位)。混响影响(RI)计算为消声条件和混响条件下SRT的差值,空间优势(SA)计算为空间分离条件和共定位条件下的差值。
24名澳大利亚年轻成年母语者、25名加拿大年轻成年母语者和34名非英语母语者。
测试条件、RI或SA方面未出现语言的显著影响。RI在传递模式方面出现了一个小但显著的影响。相对于消声条件,混响使SRT提高了5dB。
本研究中测试的群体在LISiNaR上的表现不受母语或口音的影响。